These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23336023)

  • 1. The effect of polyandry on a distorter system with differential viabilities in the sexes.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; König B; Bagheri HC
    Commun Integr Biol; 2012 Nov; 5(6):550-2. PubMed ID: 23336023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyandry and the decrease of a selfish genetic element in a wild house mouse population.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; König B; Bagheri HC
    Evolution; 2011 Sep; 65(9):2435-47. PubMed ID: 21884047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does polyandry control population sex ratio via regulation of a selfish gene?
    Price TA; Bretman A; Gradilla AC; Reger J; Taylor ML; Giraldo-Perez P; Campbell A; Hurst GD; Wedell N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 May; 281(1783):20133259. PubMed ID: 24695427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detrimental effects of an autosomal selfish genetic element on sperm competitiveness in house mice.
    Sutter A; Lindholm AK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jul; 282(1811):. PubMed ID: 26136452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution at the mouse t complex: why is the t haplotype preserved as an integral unit?
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1795-808. PubMed ID: 11108606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Together inbreeding and reproductive compensation favor lethal t-haplotypes.
    Munasinghe M; Brandvain Y
    J Hered; 2024 Oct; 115(6):672-681. PubMed ID: 38842146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sperm competition suppresses gene drive among experimentally evolving populations of house mice.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Simmons LW; Firman RC
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Oct; 26(20):5784-5792. PubMed ID: 28636785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promiscuity punishes sexual deviants.
    Engqvist L; Ramm SA
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Oct; 26(20):5359-5361. PubMed ID: 29080372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus.
    Patten MM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2360-70. PubMed ID: 25293344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. COMPETITION BETWEEN SEGREGATION DISTORTERS: COEXISTENCE OF "SUPERIOR" AND "INFERIOR" HAPLOTYPES AT THE t COMPLEX.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ; Heg D; Huisman J
    Evolution; 1996 Dec; 50(6):2488-2498. PubMed ID: 28565654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intragenomic conflict produces sex ratio dynamics that favor maternal sex ratio distorters.
    Rood ES; Freedberg S
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Nov; 6(22):8085-8093. PubMed ID: 27878080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyandry blocks gene drive in a wild house mouse population.
    Manser A; König B; Lindholm AK
    Nat Commun; 2020 Nov; 11(1):5590. PubMed ID: 33149121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. THE ROLE OF DEME SIZE, REPRODUCTIVE PATTERNS, AND DISPERSAL IN THE DYNAMICS OF t-LETHAL HAPLOTYPES.
    Nunney L; Baker AEM
    Evolution; 1993 Oct; 47(5):1342-1359. PubMed ID: 28564890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fitness consequences of the selfish supergene Segregation Distorter.
    Wong HWS; Holman L
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 31605400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selfish migrants: How a meiotic driver is selected to increase dispersal.
    Runge JN; Kokko H; Lindholm AK
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Apr; 35(4):621-632. PubMed ID: 35255164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No selection for change in polyandry under experimental evolution.
    Sutter A; Travers LM; Weedon M; Oku K; Price TAR; Wedell N
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jul; 32(7):717-730. PubMed ID: 30970158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition at the mouse t complex: rare alleles are inherently favored.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):343-58. PubMed ID: 11878834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coevolutionary dynamics of polyandry and sex-linked meiotic drive.
    Holman L; Price TA; Wedell N; Kokko H
    Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):709-20. PubMed ID: 25565579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Origin, evolution, and population genetics of the selfish Segregation Distorter gene duplication in European and African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Brand CL; Larracuente AM; Presgraves DC
    Evolution; 2015 May; 69(5):1271-83. PubMed ID: 25828399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.