94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23337105)
1. Impact of bent distortion on accuracy of measurement during transrectal ultrasonography for prostatic imaging: a preliminary study.
Lee HH; Lee JY; Yu HS; Diaz RR; Ham WS; Rha KH; Choi YD; Cho KS
Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 23337105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy of prostatic ultrasonography versus MRI in measuring prostate volume].
Hou JL; Ma WL; Dong X; Zhu XY; Zhang Q; Qiu XF; Zhuang JL; Huang HF; Guo HQ; Gan WD
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Oct; 28(10):896-900. PubMed ID: 37838956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.
Ukimura O; Hirahara N; Fujihara A; Yamada T; Iwata T; Kamoi K; Okihara K; Ito H; Nishimura T; Miki T
Int J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):890-3. PubMed ID: 20812938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.
Park SB; Kim JK; Choi SH; Noh HN; Ji EK; Cho KS
Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11752939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of targeted biopsy guided by elastic image fusion of MRI with 3D-TRUS on diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer.
Baco E; Rud E; Ukimura O; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Matsugasumi T; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB
Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1300-7. PubMed ID: 25189687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prostate volume, shape, and contouring variability determined from preimplant magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images.
Liu D; Usmani N; Ghosh S; Kamal W; Pedersen J; Pervez N; Yee D; Danielson B; Murtha A; Amanie J; Sloboda RS
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 22197014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modified prostate volume algorithm improves transrectal US volume estimation in men presenting for prostate brachytherapy.
MacMahon PJ; Kennedy AM; Murphy DT; Maher M; McNicholas MM
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 19092098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate volumetric assessment by magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: impact of variation in calculated prostate-specific antigen density on patient eligibility for active surveillance program.
Dianat SS; Rancier Ruiz RM; Bonekamp D; Carter HB; Macura KJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):589-95. PubMed ID: 23863537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI/MRSI for patients with persistently high PSA levels and negative TRUS-guided biopsy results.
Bhatia C; Phongkitkarun S; Booranapitaksonti D; Kochakarn W; Chaleumsanyakorn P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jul; 90(7):1391-9. PubMed ID: 17710982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Hoshii T; Nishiyama T; Toyabe S; Akazawa K; Komatsu S; Kaneko M; Hara N; Takahashi K
Int J Urol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 17470159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts.
Hong MK; Yao HH; Rzetelski-West K; Namdarian B; Pedersen J; Peters JS; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():57-63. PubMed ID: 22458496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]