130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23337271)
1. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles.
Walter R; Kosy JD; Cove R
Foot Ankle Surg; 2013 Mar; 19(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 23337271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Incorrect Foot Placement on the Accuracy of Radiographic Measurements of the Hallux Valgus and Inter-Metatarsal Angles for Treating Hallux Valgus.
Kuyucu E; Ceylan HH; Surucu S; Erdil I; Kara A; Gulenc BG; Bulbul M; Erdil M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 28809639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the distal metatarsal articular angle in adult hallux valgus.
Chi TD; Davitt J; Younger A; Holt S; Sangeorzan BJ
Foot Ankle Int; 2002 Aug; 23(8):722-6. PubMed ID: 12199386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles [Foot Ankle Surg. 19 (1) (2013) 18-21].
Guler F; Kose O; Ozyurek S
Foot Ankle Surg; 2013 Sep; 19(3):206. PubMed ID: 23830174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra- and Interobserver Agreement in Hallux Valgus Angle Measurements on Weightbearing and Non-Weightbearing Radiographs.
van der Woude P; Keizer SB; Wever-Korevaar M; Thomassen BJW
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jul; 58(4):706-712. PubMed ID: 31256898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Point-Connecting Measurements of the Hallux Valgus Deformity: A New Measurement and Its Clinical Application.
Seo JH; Ahn JY; Boedijono D
Yonsei Med J; 2016 May; 57(3):741-7. PubMed ID: 26996576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones.
Huang T; Wang L; Lu C; Zhong W; Zhao Z; Luo X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Aug; 22(1):716. PubMed ID: 34419028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters.
Panchbhavi VK; Trevino S
Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Oct; 25(10):708-11. PubMed ID: 15566701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program.
Piqué-Vidal C; Maled-García I; Arabi-Moreno J; Vila J
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Mar; 27(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 16539898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of hallux valgus.
Ege T; Kose O; Koca K; Demiralp B; Basbozkurt M
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Feb; 42(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22669733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of different smartphones measuring the hallux valgus parameters in a new rapid method: a follow-up study.
Wang L; Zhang C; Liang H; Zhang J; Zhong W; Zhao Z; Huang T; Luo X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):315. PubMed ID: 35366850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison Between X-ray Imaging and an Innovative Computer-aided Design Method Based on Weightbearing CT Scan Images for Assessing Hallux Valgus.
Zhong Z; Zhang P; Duan H; Yang H; Li Q; He F
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2021; 60(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 32253154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet.
Jastifer JR; Coughlin MJ; Schutt S; Hirose C; Kennedy M; Grebing B; Smith B; Cooper T; Golano P; Viladot R; Doty JF
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Apr; 35(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 24521690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of Two Smartphone Applications for Radiographic Measurements of Hallux Valgus Angles.
Mattos E Dinato MC; Freitas MF; Milano C; Valloto E; Ninomiya AF; Pagnano RG
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):230-233. PubMed ID: 28231958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of hallux valgus angular measurements and the study of a linear measurement.
Sanhudo JV; Gomes JE; Rabello MC; Delucca G
Foot Ankle Spec; 2012 Dec; 5(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 22965218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements.
Meng HZ; Zhang WL; Li XC; Yang MW
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1250-4. PubMed ID: 25763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative radiological factors correlated to long-term recurrence of hallux valgus following distal chevron osteotomy.
Pentikainen I; Ojala R; Ohtonen P; Piippo J; Leppilahti J
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1262-7. PubMed ID: 25192724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hallux valgus interphalangeus: reliability of radiological assessment.
Hujazi I; Yassa R; Sevenoaks H; Khalfaoui M; Barrie J
Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Aug; 25(4):507-510. PubMed ID: 30321956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy.
Shima H; Okuda R; Yasuda T; Jotoku T; Kitano N; Kinoshita M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 19487514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: intra-and-inter-observer reliability of the distal metatarsal articular angle in adult hallux valgus, Chi T, et al, Foot Ankle Int. 23(8):722-726, 2002.
Coughlin MJ
Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Jun; 25(6):443-4. PubMed ID: 15215035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
