These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23338259)
1. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols. Medina AD; de Paula AB; de Fucio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23338259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations. Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of oil contamination on in vitro bond strength of bonding agents to dental substrates. Matos AB; Oliveira DC; Vieira SN; Netto NG; Powers JM Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 18578177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations. Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of restorative technique and thermal/mechanical treatment on marginal adaptation and compressive strength of esthetic restorations. de Paula AB; Duque C; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 18666502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations. Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations using a resin liner on deproteinized substrate. Correr GM; Bruschi Alonso RC; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Coelho Sinhoreti MA Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 16040445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. Figueiredo Reis A; Giannini M; Ambrosano GM; Chan DC J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12615021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth. Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of sodium hypochlorite on microleakage of composite resin restorations using three adhesive systems. Shinohara MS; Bedran-de-Castro AK; Amaral CM; Pimenta LA J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 15293421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements. Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements. Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microtensile bond strength between indirect composite resin inlays and dentin: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical aging. Prochnow EP; Amaral M; Bergoli CD; Silva TB; Saavedra G; Valandro LF J Adhes Dent; 2014 Aug; 16(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 24669369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations. Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging. Manhart J; Trumm C Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 19937075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]