These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23338264)

  • 1. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
    de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2005 Sep; 23(3):124-5. PubMed ID: 16224130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of endodontic file lengths: a density profile plot analysis.
    Piepenbring ME; Potter BJ; Weller RN; Loushine RJ
    J Endod; 2000 Oct; 26(10):615-8. PubMed ID: 11199805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.
    Kaufman AY; Keila S; Yoshpe M
    Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11843975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
    Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo study.
    Wankhade AD; Kumar R; Singh RK; Chandra A
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(2):E38-42. PubMed ID: 23635968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and Evaluation of an Endodontic Simulation Model for Dental Students.
    Wolgin M; Wiedemann P; Frank W; Wrbas KT; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1363-72. PubMed ID: 26522643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apical transportation: two assessment methods.
    López FU; Travessas JA; Fachin E; Fontanella V; Grecca F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 19703081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of apical root transportation associated with ProTaper Universal F3 and F4 instruments by using digital subtraction radiography.
    Kunert GG; Camargo Fontanella VR; de Moura AA; Barletta FB
    J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1052-5. PubMed ID: 20478464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study.
    Kishor KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 23151708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new approach for locating the minor apical foramen using an artificial neural network.
    Saghiri MA; Asgar K; Boukani KK; Lotfi M; Aghili H; Delvarani A; Karamifar K; Saghiri AM; Mehrvarzfar P; Garcia-Godoy F
    Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 22007705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ex vivo investigation on the postoperative integrity of the apical constriction after the sole use of electronic working length determination.
    Wolgin M; Grundmann MJ; Tchorz JP; Frank W; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():52-57. PubMed ID: 28642058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.