These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2333855)

  • 1. Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents.
    Bishara SE; Abdalla EM; Hoppens BJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 2333855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric comparisons of the dentofacial relationships of two adolescent populations from Iowa and northern Mexico.
    Bishara SE; Fernandez AG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 3863489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateral cephalometric norms for adolescent Kuwaitis: hard tissue measurements.
    Al-Jame B; Artun J; Al-Azemi R; Behbehani F; Buhamra S
    Med Princ Pract; 2006; 15(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16484833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roentgencephalometric standards for the facial skeleton and soft tissue profile of Swedish children and young adults. II. Comparisons with earlier Scandinavian normative data.
    Thilander B; Persson M; Skagius S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():219-28. PubMed ID: 6963777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States.
    Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR; Abdallah EM; Fernandez Garcia A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Nov; 96(5):416-22. PubMed ID: 2816841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentofacial changes in Norwegian and Iowan populations between 6 and 18 years of age.
    el-Batouti A; Bishara S; Ogaard B; Jakobsen J
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Jun; 17(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 7621925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.
    Mellion ZJ; Behrents RG; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):845-54. PubMed ID: 23726335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial characteristics].
    Racek J; Kameník K; Racková I
    Cesk Stomatol; 1982 Dec; 82(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 6961957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The effect of growth and development on soft tissue profile in boys and girls with normal occlusion].
    Uner O; Dinçer M; Eroğlu EY
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2101660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective evaluation of facial soft tissue cephalometric parameters in adolescents with normal occlusion.
    Poosti M; Ramezanzadeh B; Salehi T; Rashed R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 20687311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative cephalometric investigation of the Greek craniofacial pattern through 4,000 years.
    Argyropoulos E; Sassouni V; Xeniotou A
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 2672905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial height comparison in young white and black Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion.
    de Freitas LM; Pinzan A; Janson G; Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):706.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17561045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posteroanterior cephalometric norms for an adolescent Kuwaiti population.
    Al-Azemi R; Årtun J
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 21402735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric appraisal of dento-facial and soft tissue pattern in Indo-Aryans.
    Grewal H; Sidhu SS; Kharbanda OP
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1994 Sep; 8(3):87-96. PubMed ID: 9791249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
    Akgül AA; Toygar TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in craniofacial and dental characteristics of adolescent Mexican Americans and European Americans.
    Vela E; Taylor RW; Campbell PM; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):839-47. PubMed ID: 22133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.