BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2333856)

  • 1. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
    Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the relative parallelism of occlusal plane to three ala-tragal lines in various skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric study.
    Venugopalan SK; SatishBabu CL; Rani MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 23649052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The occlusal plane in Class I and Class II malocclusion: its relation to craniofacial variables].
    Kuntz M; Turlot JC; Hildwein M
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():383-93. PubMed ID: 3078360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Wits" appraisal in southern Chinese children.
    So LL; Davis PJ; King NM
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2316903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Palatal Plane and Occlusal Plane for Determining Anteroposterior Jaw Relation.
    Pyakurel U; Thapaliya KB; Singh K; Gupta A; Gupta S; Bajracharya M; Shrestha RM; Mishra P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2019; 57(215):3-7. PubMed ID: 31080237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of Wits appraisal with superimposition method].
    Xu T; Ahn J; Baumrind S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 34(4):211-3. PubMed ID: 11776907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal.
    Sherman SL; Woods M; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 May; 93(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 3163222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The position of the occlusal plane in dentulous subjects with various skeletal jaw-relationships.
    Sinobad D
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Sep; 15(5):489-98. PubMed ID: 3244056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients.
    Iwasaki H; Ishikawa H; Chowdhury L; Nakamura S; Iida J
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 12407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric comparison between Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion in adults.
    Fischer-Brandies H; Fischer-Brandies E; König A
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3860257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.
    Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1975 Feb; 67(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 1054214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].
    Liu DX; Zhang L; Wang CL; Zhang XY; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 16999351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.