These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23338560)

  • 1. Why longer song elements are easier to detect: threshold level-duration functions in the Great Tit and comparison with human data.
    Pohl NU; Slabbekoorn H; Neubauer H; Heil P; Klump GM; Langemann U
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Mar; 199(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 23338560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of signal features and background noise on distance cue discrimination by a songbird.
    Pohl NU; Klump GM; Langemann U
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Apr; 218(Pt 7):1006-15. PubMed ID: 25657204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of auditory signals in quiet and noisy backgrounds while performing a visuo-spatial task.
    Rawool VW
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):283-287. PubMed ID: 27991458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (I) behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird.
    Langemann U; Klump GM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 26(7):1969-78. PubMed ID: 17897400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of signal duration on the underwater detection thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for single frequency-modulated tonal signals between 0.25 and 160 kHz.
    Kastelein RA; Hoek L; de Jong CA; Wensveen PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3211-22. PubMed ID: 21110616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory sensitivity in the great tit: perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise.
    Langemann U; Gauger B; Klump GM
    Anim Behav; 1998 Sep; 56(3):763-769. PubMed ID: 9784228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical representation of the combination of monaural and binaural unmasking.
    Uppenkamp S; Uhlig CH; Verhey JL
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():435-42. PubMed ID: 23716250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychophysics of absolute threshold and signal duration: a probabilistic approach.
    Meddis R; Lecluyse W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3153-65. PubMed ID: 21568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection and intensity discrimination of Gaussian-shaped tone pulses as a function of duration.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1907-16. PubMed ID: 10530015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory masking patterns in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with natural, anthropogenic, and synthesized noise.
    Branstetter BK; Trickey JS; Bakhtiari K; Black A; Aihara H; Finneran JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1811-8. PubMed ID: 23464049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Oct; 70(4):1003-14. PubMed ID: 7288037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of Tones Masked by Fluctuating Noise in Rat Auditory Cortex.
    Hershenhoren I; Nelken I
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Nov; 27(11):5130-5143. PubMed ID: 28334090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A probabilistic Poisson-based model accounts for an extensive set of absolute auditory threshold measurements.
    Heil P; Matysiak A; Neubauer H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():135-161. PubMed ID: 28716582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The heterospecific calling song can improve conspecific signal detection in a bushcricket species.
    Abdelatti ZAS; Hartbauer M
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():70-80. PubMed ID: 28974384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits.
    Mockford EJ; Marshall RC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Aug; 276(1669):2979-85. PubMed ID: 19493902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The tradeoff between signal detection and recognition rules auditory sensitivity under variable background noise conditions.
    Lugli M
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():1-6. PubMed ID: 26375371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different Seasonal Patterns in Song System Volume in Willow Tits and Great Tits.
    Longmoor GK; Lange CH; Darvell H; Walker L; Rytkönen S; Vatka E; Hohtola E; Orell M; Smulders TV
    Brain Behav Evol; 2016; 87(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 27442125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of signal duration on the recognition of masked communication signals by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus.
    Ronacher B; Krahe R; Hennig RM
    J Comp Physiol A; 2000 Nov; 186(11):1065-72. PubMed ID: 11195282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.