These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23338763)

  • 21. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
    Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
    Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automated volumetric breast density estimation out of digital breast tomosynthesis data: feasibility study of a new software version.
    Machida Y; Saita A; Namba H; Fukuma E
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):780. PubMed ID: 27386266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Sebuødegård S; Bandos AI; Gur D; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Hofvind S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jun; 169(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 29429017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Value of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the diagnosis of breast lesions].
    Yang L; Li J; Zhou CW
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 39(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 28104031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.
    Gennaro G; Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):573-581. PubMed ID: 28819862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms.
    Hakim CM; Catullo VJ; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Kelly AE; Shinde DD; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Bandos AI; Gur D
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25768673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Imaging characteristics of interval cancers detected on Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
    Majid SZ; Senapati GM; Lacson R; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Mar; 107():110063. PubMed ID: 38232642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A reader study comparing prospective tomosynthesis interpretations with retrospective readings of the corresponding FFDM examinations.
    Rose SL; Tidwell AL; Ice MF; Nordmann AS; Sexton R; Song R
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1204-10. PubMed ID: 25107868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Hodgson R; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Harvey SC; Edwards M; Shaikh J; Arber M; Glanville J
    Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():52-61. PubMed ID: 27212700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for breast disease diagnosis].
    Wang Q; Hu GD; Kuang J; Li JM
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 29(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 19246303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The breast cancer diagnosis accuracy of the digital breast tomosynthesis technique].
    Zhang HW; Li JT; Lü MH; Qin L; Li LF; Cui SD; Liu H
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(18):1387-1390. PubMed ID: 28535623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Initial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment.
    Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2014; 4():9. PubMed ID: 24744966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Associating Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) in Clinical Practice in Cases of Women with Dense Breast Tissue.
    Boca Bene I; Ciurea AI; Vesa ȘC; Ciortea CA; Dudea SM; Manole S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammography Positioning Standards in the Digital Era: Is the Status Quo Acceptable?
    Huppe AI; Overman KL; Gatewood JB; Hill JD; Miller LC; Inciardi MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1419-1425. PubMed ID: 28871810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
    Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis.
    Yun SJ; Ryu CW; Rhee SJ; Ryu JK; Oh JY
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):557-569. PubMed ID: 28516226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biologic Profiles of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected Only With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Kim JY; Kang HJ; Shin JK; Lee NK; Song YS; Nam KJ; Choo KS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1411-1418. PubMed ID: 28834445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis for predicting response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and full-field digital mammography.
    Murakami R; Tani H; Kumita S; Uchiyama N
    Acta Radiol Open; 2021 Dec; 10(12):20584601211063746. PubMed ID: 34992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
    Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,and Digital Mammography for Early Breast Cancer].
    Xu AQ; Weng XB; Zheng J; Li ZQ; Wang XL; Zhang SJ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 41(5):667-672. PubMed ID: 31699198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.