These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23338911)

  • 1. Coronary computed tomography angiography with prospective electrocardiography triggering: a systematic review of image quality and radiation dose.
    Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2013 Jan; 54(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 23338911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
    Zhang LJ; Wang Y; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Bayer RR; Qi L; Cao J; Zhou CS; Zhao YE; Li X; Gong JB; Jin Z; Lu GM
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Mar; 26(3):797-806. PubMed ID: 26382844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stents: image quality and radiation doses for low voltage (100 kVp) and standard voltage (120 kVp) ECG-triggered scanning.
    Lee JW; Kim CW; Lee HC; Wu MT; Hwangbo L; Choo KS; Kim JH; Lee KN; Kim JY; Jeong YJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():39-49. PubMed ID: 26022439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols.
    Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Yusof AK
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of sub-mSv prospective ECG-triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease.
    Gao W; Zhong YM; Sun AM; Wang Q; Ouyang RZ; Hu LW; Qiu HS; Wang SY; Li JY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 26897005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience.
    Zhang LJ; Qi L; Wang J; Tang CX; Zhou CS; Ji XM; Spearman JV; De Cecco CN; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ; Lu GM
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1537-46. PubMed ID: 24737530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Submillisievert coronary CT angiography with adaptive prospective ECG-triggered sequence acquisition and iterative reconstruction in patients with high heart rate on the dual-source CT.
    Tang PH; Du BJ; Fang XM; Hu XY; Qian PY; Gao QS
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):807-820. PubMed ID: 27612046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of image quality and radiation dose in prospective ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography compared with retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography.
    Ko SM; Kim NR; Kim DH; Song MG; Kim JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():93-101. PubMed ID: 20033490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The feasibility of sub-millisievert coronary CT angiography with low tube voltage, prospective ECG gating, and a knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm.
    Park CH; Lee J; Oh C; Han KH; Kim TH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31 Suppl 2():197-203. PubMed ID: 26521066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronary CT angiography with 80 kV tube voltage and low iodine concentration contrast agent in patients with low body weight.
    Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Segurini C; Guglielmo M; Petullà M; Volpato V; Annoni A; Baggiano A; Formenti A; Bartorelli AL; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 27357327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Feng Q; Yin Y; Hua X; Zhu R; Hua J; Xu J
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Oct; 65(10):809-14. PubMed ID: 20797467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multidetector computed tomography for coronary stents imaging: high-voltage (140-kVp) prospective ECG-triggered versus standard-voltage (120-kVp) retrospective ECG-gated helical scanning.
    Esposito A; Colantoni C; De Cobelli F; Del Vecchio A; Palmisano A; Calandrino R; Del Maschio A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23674011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with sub-milliSievert radiation dose by prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral CT angiography and iterative reconstruction.
    Yin WH; Lu B; Hou ZH; Li N; Han L; Wu YJ; Niu HX; Silverman JR; Nicola De Cecco C; Schoepf UJ
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):2927-33. PubMed ID: 23807568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose, image quality, stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography: a phantom study.
    Horiguchi J; Kiguchi M; Fujioka C; Shen Y; Arie R; Sunasaka K; Ito K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 18212215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization.
    Layritz C; Schmid J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Wuest W; May M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T; Lell M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 15(11):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24939952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Meng XC; Zhang JS; Dong YX; Fang Y; Shan H
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 21513855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality in low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography with a new high-definition CT scanner.
    Kazakauskaite E; Husmann L; Stehli J; Fuchs T; Fiechter M; Klaeser B; Ghadri JR; Gebhard C; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):471-7. PubMed ID: 22825255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subtraction coronary CT angiography using second-generation 320-detector row CT.
    Yoshioka K; Tanaka R; Muranaka K; Sasaki T; Ueda T; Chiba T; Takeda K; Sugawara T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():51-8. PubMed ID: 25721727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose between prospective triggering and retrospective gated coronary angiography by dual-source computed tomography.
    Lu B; Lu JG; Sun ML; Hou ZH; Chen XB; Tang X; Wu RZ; Johnson L; Qiao SB; Yang YJ; Jiang SL
    Am J Cardiol; 2011 May; 107(9):1278-84. PubMed ID: 21497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.