These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23338964)

  • 1. Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?
    Onukwugha E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 23338964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Specifying a Conceptual Treatment Choice Relationship Before Analysis Is Necessary for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Cozad MJ; Chapman CG; Brooks JM
    Med Care; 2017 Feb; 55(2):94-96. PubMed ID: 27547948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The architecture of clinical research (From the "Biostatistics and Epidemiology Lecture Series, Part 1").
    Stoller JK
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2017 Sep; 84(9 Suppl 2):e2-e9. PubMed ID: 28937357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research.
    Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1991-5; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores.
    Inacio MC; Chen Y; Paxton EW; Namba RS; Kurtz SM; Cafri G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2722-6. PubMed ID: 25773902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observational human studies in allergic diseases: design concepts and highlights of recent National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-funded research.
    Rudman Spergel AK; Togias A
    Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2020 Apr; 20(2):208-214. PubMed ID: 31934890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges of Assessing Therapeutic or Diagnostic Outcomes with Observational Data.
    Weintraub WS; Yeh RW
    Am J Med; 2018 Feb; 131(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 29103925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical and clinical interpretation of research results.
    Allison GT
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17369326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Alemayehu D; Cappelleri JC
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 22128798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.
    Scott IA; Attia J
    Intern Med J; 2017 Feb; 47(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 27345967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.
    Guan M; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can we use levels of evidence to make a decision?
    Harvey E
    Can J Surg; 2020 Feb; 63(1):E86. PubMed ID: 32103654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking reanalysis.
    Christakis DA; Zimmerman FJ
    JAMA; 2013 Dec; 310(23):2499-500. PubMed ID: 24346985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical analysis plans in observational research.
    Trinh QD; Sun M
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical analysis plans in observational research--reply.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research.
    Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of real-world data in cancer drug development.
    Skovlund E; Leufkens HGM; Smyth JF
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Sep; 101():69-76. PubMed ID: 30031168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A guide to improve your causal inferences from observational data.
    Raymaekers K; Luyckx K; Moons P
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Dec; 19(8):757-762. PubMed ID: 33040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality standards for real-world research. Focus on observational database studies of comparative effectiveness.
    Roche N; Reddel H; Martin R; Brusselle G; Papi A; Thomas M; Postma D; Thomas V; Rand C; Chisholm A; Price D;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2014 Feb; 11 Suppl 2():S99-104. PubMed ID: 24559028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.