These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23338964)

  • 21. Time-dependent biases in observational studies of comparative effectiveness research in rheumatology. A methodological review.
    Iudici M; Porcher R; Riveros C; Ravaud P
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2019 Apr; 78(4):562-569. PubMed ID: 30755417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [When is enough evidence available?; interim analyses in clinical trials].
    van der Tweel Iv; Roes KC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(12):A5660. PubMed ID: 23515039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative effectiveness research in oncology: an overview.
    Lyman GH; Levine M
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4181-4. PubMed ID: 23071249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing strength of evidence for regulatory decision making in licensing: What proof do we need for observational studies of effectiveness?
    Slattery J; Kurz X
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1336-1340. PubMed ID: 32301230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Basics to perform and present statistical analyses in scientific biomedical reports Part 3.
    Cesana BM; Cavaliere F
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Oct; 82(10):1032-1035. PubMed ID: 27327857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Moose on the loose: checklist for meta-analyses of observational studies.
    van Zuuren EJ; Fedorowicz Z
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):853-854. PubMed ID: 27790686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical Research Methodology 2: Observational Clinical Research.
    Sessler DI; Imrey PB
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 26378704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research.
    Jannot AS; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23347853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Study Design in Neurosurgical Research: Considerations for Observational and Experimental Cohort Studies.
    Louie CE; D'Agostino E; Woods A; Ryken T
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31552423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Study design and statistical analysis.
    Elston DM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):207. PubMed ID: 29128448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report.
    Berger ML; Dreyer N; Anderson F; Towse A; Sedrakyan A; Normand SL
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 22433752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving Reporting Quality in Ophthalmologic Observational Studies That Use Big Data: The Case of Retinal Detachment Associated With Fluoroquinolone Use.
    Etminan M; Maberley DAL
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(6):611-612. PubMed ID: 29710207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.
    Berger ML; Martin BC; Husereau D; Worley K; Allen JD; Yang W; Quon NC; Mullins CD; Kahler KH; Crown W
    Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24636373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
    Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available.
    Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 183(8):758-64. PubMed ID: 26994063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
    Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. StatBite: Volume and cost of comparative effectiveness research in the United States.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Aug; 101(15):1037. PubMed ID: 19638501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
    Berger ML; Mamdani M; Atkins D; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 19793072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.