These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23339352)

  • 1. Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers.
    Kuperman V; Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):802-23. PubMed ID: 23339352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition.
    Ventura P; Fernandes T; Pereira A; Guerreiro JC; Farinha-Fernandes A; Delgado J; Ferreira MF; Faustino B; Raposo I; Wong AC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2739-2750. PubMed ID: 32077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of age and word frequency on Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from a web-based large-scale lexical-decision task.
    Baek H; Gordon PC; Choi W
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 38236269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Kuperman V
    Cortex; 2019 Jul; 116():250-267. PubMed ID: 30149964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural representations for newly learned words are modulated by overnight consolidation, reading skill, and age.
    Landi N; Malins JG; Frost SJ; Magnuson JS; Molfese P; Ryherd K; Rueckl JG; Mencl WE; Pugh KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():133-144. PubMed ID: 29366948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading books: The positive impact of print exposure on written word recognition.
    Chetail F
    Cognition; 2024 Oct; 251():105905. PubMed ID: 39094254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Jordan TR; Dixon J; McGowan VA; Kurtev S; Paterson KB
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1433. PubMed ID: 27733837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.
    Eisenhauer S; Fiebach CJ; Gagl B
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 31072907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading.
    Li X; Rayner K; Cave KR
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Jun; 58(4):525-52. PubMed ID: 19345938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Sibley DE; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 21728459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word Type and Frequency Effects on Lexical Decisions Are Process-dependent and Start Early.
    Krause J; van Rij J; Borst JP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Oct; 36(10):2227-2250. PubMed ID: 38991140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual word learning in skilled readers of English.
    Kwok RK; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):326-49. PubMed ID: 25019273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Extra Interletter Spacing Help Text Reading in Skilled Adult Readers?
    Perea M; Giner L; Marcet A; Gomez P
    Span J Psychol; 2016 May; 19():E26. PubMed ID: 27210581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unmasking individual differences in adult reading procedures by disrupting holistic orthographic perception.
    Hirshorn EA; Simcox T; Durisko C; Perfetti CA; Fiez JA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233041. PubMed ID: 32453792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.