BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 233395)

  • 1. Comparison of suture materials for intestinal anastomosis.
    Bornemissza G; Szentkereszty B; Furka I; Mikó I
    Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung; 1979; 20(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 233395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental study of suture materials placed in the renal parenchyma.
    Mikó I; Szokoly V; Furka I; Greguss E; Páll M; Pintér J; Szabó Z
    Acta Chir Hung; 1984; 25(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 6328812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different absorbable sutures on healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses.
    Deveney KE; Way LW
    Am J Surg; 1977 Jan; 133(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 835784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of polyglycolic aicd sutures in colon anastomoses.
    Letwin ER
    Can J Surg; 1975 Jan; 18(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 1091339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A morphological evaluation of single-row and double-row sutures on the colon].
    Zemlianoĭ AG; Glushkov NI; Levashova NV
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1992; 149(11-12):322-6. PubMed ID: 8594789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experimental evaluation of 4 different suture materials in colo-colic anastomoses (in the rat)].
    Bonoldi AP; Cabano F; Castellaro E; Ghirardi F; Zonta A
    Chir Ital; 1988; 40(4-5):265-71. PubMed ID: 3149915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Single-layer colonic anastomoses using polyglyconate (Maxon) vs. two-layer anastomoses using chromic catgut and silk. Experimental study].
    García-Osogobio SM; Takahashi-Monroy T; Velasco L; Gaxiola M; Sotres-Vega A; Santillán-Doherty P
    Rev Invest Clin; 2006; 58(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 16958294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dexon versus chromic catgut-Mersilene simultaneously employed for gastro-intestinal anastomoses, evaluated endoscopically.
    Schoubye J
    Acta Chir Scand; 1978; 144(7-8):441-3. PubMed ID: 371317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of 10-0 polyglycolic acid and polyglactin suture in rabbit limbal wounds.
    Sugar A
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 Jan; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 6244525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Experimental studies on the usefulness of Dexon (polyglycolic acid) and our own modified suture method for suturing after tendon severing].
    Minta P
    Z Exp Chir; 1980; 13(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 6255691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimental comparison of suture materials for tracheal and bronchial anastomoses.
    Peleg H; Rao UN; Emrich LJ
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Dec; 34(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 2433801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of microcirculatory changes in the duodenum of dogs caused by surgical suture materials.
    Petö K; Nagy A; Hauck M; Mikó I; Furka I
    Acta Chir Hung; 1997; 36(1-4):274-6. PubMed ID: 9408372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A morphologic study on the effect of suturing the submucosa of the large intestine.
    Lord MG; Broughton AC; Williams HT
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Feb; 146(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 146271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [In vivo investigations on suture reactions under sterile and not sterile conditions. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials (author's transl)].
    Thiede A; Lünstedt B
    Zentralbl Chir; 1979; 104(9):568-81. PubMed ID: 525088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Intestinal sutures. Comparative study between the classical suture in 2 planes and the extramucosal suture in a single plane using a new absorbable thread, polyglycolic acid].
    Rosenberg D; Nasser A; Regen JB; Behmer OA
    AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras; 1973 Jun; 19(6):349-58. PubMed ID: 4588376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-layer colonic anastomosis with polyglycolic acid (Dexon) suture: a 3-year prospective audit.
    Motson RW; Bolwell JS; Heath AL; Makin CA; Al Sawaf H
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1984 Jan; 66(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 6318643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histologic response to microsuture materials.
    Beauchamp PJ; Guzick DS; Held B; Schmidt WA
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Jul; 33(7):615-23. PubMed ID: 2845074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Reaction of some suture materials on the process of intestinal healing. Experimental study (author's transl)].
    Randano F; Tartaglia A; Mazzeo F
    J Chir (Paris); 1979 Oct; 116(10):609-11. PubMed ID: 541362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of the physical parameters and handling properties of short-duration and middle-duration absorbable suture materials].
    Thiede A; Stüwe W; Lünstedt B
    Chirurg; 1985 Dec; 56(12):803-8. PubMed ID: 3002727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.