These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23339555)

  • 1. Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.
    Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Niazi I; Sheppard R; Worley S; Beau S; Greer GS; Aryana A; Cao M; Harbert N; Zhang S;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 23339555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
    Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
    Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial.
    Lenarczyk R; Kowalski O; Sredniawa B; Pruszkowska-Skrzep P; Mazurek M; Jędrzejczyk-Patej E; Woźniak A; Pluta S; Głowacki J; Kalarus Z
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1228-36. PubMed ID: 22651239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of Anatomically Designed Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads: Results from the NAVIGATE X4 Clinical Trial.
    Mittal S; Nair D; Padanilam BJ; Ciuffo A; Gupta N; Gallagher P; Goldner B; Hammill EF; Wold N; Stein K; Burke M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1199-1205. PubMed ID: 27434039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead.
    Sperzel J; Dänschel W; Gutleben KJ; Kranig W; Mortensen P; Connelly D; Trappe HJ; Seidl K; Duray G; Pieske B; Stockinger J; Boriani G; Jung W; Schilling R; Saberi L; Hallier B; Simon M; Rinaldi CA
    Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 21993431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
    Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
    Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive factors of difficult implantation procedure in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bisch L; Da Costa A; Dauphinot V; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Khris L; M'baye A; Isaaz K
    Europace; 2010 Aug; 12(8):1141-8. PubMed ID: 20573673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.
    Crossley GH; Biffi M; Johnson B; Lin A; Gras D; Hussin A; Cuffio A; Collier JL; El-Chami M; Li S; Holloman K; Exner DV
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Apr; 12(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 25533587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Heart Failure in the BLOCK HF Trial.
    St John Sutton M; Plappert T; Adamson PB; Li P; Christman SA; Chung ES; Curtis AB
    Circ Heart Fail; 2015 May; 8(3):510-8. PubMed ID: 25697851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
    Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement in hemodynamic response using a quadripolar LV lead.
    Cabrera Bueno F; Alzueta Rodríguez J; Olagüe de Ros J; Fernández-Lozano I; García Guerrero JJ; de la Concha JF; Hernández Madrid A; Tolosana Viu JM; Osca Asensi J; Barrera Cordero A; Llorente Hernangómez E
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 36(8):963-9. PubMed ID: 23692289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occurrence of phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: the role of left ventricular lead type and placement site.
    Biffi M; Exner DV; Crossley GH; Ramza B; Coutu B; Tomassoni G; Kranig W; Li S; Kristiansen N; Voss F
    Europace; 2013 Jan; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 22848075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right ventricular septum presents the optimum site for maximal electrical separation during left ventricular pacing.
    Miranda RI; Nault M; Simpson CS; Michael KA; Abdollah H; Baranchuk A; Redfearn DP
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22049976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.
    Forleo GB; Mantica M; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Santamaria M; Santangeli P; Avella A; Sergi D; Santini L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):1822-8. PubMed ID: 22841876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endurance and performance of two different concepts for left ventricular stimulation with bipolar epicardial leads in long-term follow-up.
    Burger H; Kempfert J; van Linden A; Szalay Z; Schoenburg M; Walther T; Ziegelhoeffer T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 60(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 21789760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.
    Mair H; Sachweh J; Meuris B; Nollert G; Schmoeckel M; Schuetz A; Reichart B; Daebritz S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 27(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 15691676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implantation of left ventricular epicardial leads in cardiosurgical patients with impaired cardiac function--a worthwhile procedure in concomitant surgical interventions?
    Mellert F; Schneider C; Esmailzadeh B; Balta O; Haushofer M; Schiller W; Preusse CJ; Welz A
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 60(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 21425053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term performance of the attain model 4193 left ventricular lead.
    Johnson WB; Abraham WT; Young JB; Wheelan K; Smith AL; Chang Y; Brinkman P;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Sep; 32(9):1111-6. PubMed ID: 19719485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.
    Mehta PA; Shetty AK; Squirrel M; Bostock J; Rinaldi CA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21833513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.