BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23339555)

  • 1. Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.
    Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Niazi I; Sheppard R; Worley S; Beau S; Greer GS; Aryana A; Cao M; Harbert N; Zhang S;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 23339555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
    Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
    Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
    Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial.
    Lenarczyk R; Kowalski O; Sredniawa B; Pruszkowska-Skrzep P; Mazurek M; Jędrzejczyk-Patej E; Woźniak A; Pluta S; Głowacki J; Kalarus Z
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1228-36. PubMed ID: 22651239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of Anatomically Designed Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads: Results from the NAVIGATE X4 Clinical Trial.
    Mittal S; Nair D; Padanilam BJ; Ciuffo A; Gupta N; Gallagher P; Goldner B; Hammill EF; Wold N; Stein K; Burke M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1199-1205. PubMed ID: 27434039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead.
    Sperzel J; Dänschel W; Gutleben KJ; Kranig W; Mortensen P; Connelly D; Trappe HJ; Seidl K; Duray G; Pieske B; Stockinger J; Boriani G; Jung W; Schilling R; Saberi L; Hallier B; Simon M; Rinaldi CA
    Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 21993431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
    Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive factors of difficult implantation procedure in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bisch L; Da Costa A; Dauphinot V; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Khris L; M'baye A; Isaaz K
    Europace; 2010 Aug; 12(8):1141-8. PubMed ID: 20573673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.
    Crossley GH; Biffi M; Johnson B; Lin A; Gras D; Hussin A; Cuffio A; Collier JL; El-Chami M; Li S; Holloman K; Exner DV
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Apr; 12(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 25533587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Heart Failure in the BLOCK HF Trial.
    St John Sutton M; Plappert T; Adamson PB; Li P; Christman SA; Chung ES; Curtis AB
    Circ Heart Fail; 2015 May; 8(3):510-8. PubMed ID: 25697851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
    Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement in hemodynamic response using a quadripolar LV lead.
    Cabrera Bueno F; Alzueta Rodríguez J; Olagüe de Ros J; Fernández-Lozano I; García Guerrero JJ; de la Concha JF; Hernández Madrid A; Tolosana Viu JM; Osca Asensi J; Barrera Cordero A; Llorente Hernangómez E
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 36(8):963-9. PubMed ID: 23692289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occurrence of phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: the role of left ventricular lead type and placement site.
    Biffi M; Exner DV; Crossley GH; Ramza B; Coutu B; Tomassoni G; Kranig W; Li S; Kristiansen N; Voss F
    Europace; 2013 Jan; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 22848075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right ventricular septum presents the optimum site for maximal electrical separation during left ventricular pacing.
    Miranda RI; Nault M; Simpson CS; Michael KA; Abdollah H; Baranchuk A; Redfearn DP
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22049976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.
    Forleo GB; Mantica M; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Santamaria M; Santangeli P; Avella A; Sergi D; Santini L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):1822-8. PubMed ID: 22841876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endurance and performance of two different concepts for left ventricular stimulation with bipolar epicardial leads in long-term follow-up.
    Burger H; Kempfert J; van Linden A; Szalay Z; Schoenburg M; Walther T; Ziegelhoeffer T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 60(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 21789760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.
    Mair H; Sachweh J; Meuris B; Nollert G; Schmoeckel M; Schuetz A; Reichart B; Daebritz S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 27(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 15691676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implantation of left ventricular epicardial leads in cardiosurgical patients with impaired cardiac function--a worthwhile procedure in concomitant surgical interventions?
    Mellert F; Schneider C; Esmailzadeh B; Balta O; Haushofer M; Schiller W; Preusse CJ; Welz A
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 60(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 21425053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term performance of the attain model 4193 left ventricular lead.
    Johnson WB; Abraham WT; Young JB; Wheelan K; Smith AL; Chang Y; Brinkman P;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Sep; 32(9):1111-6. PubMed ID: 19719485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.
    Mehta PA; Shetty AK; Squirrel M; Bostock J; Rinaldi CA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21833513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.