255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23339555)
21. Tailoring device settings in cardiac resynchronization therapy using electrograms from pacing electrodes.
Engels EB; Mafi-Rad M; Hermans BJM; Aranda A; van Stipdonk AMW; Rienstra M; Scheerder COS; Maass AH; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
Europace; 2018 Jul; 20(7):1146-1153. PubMed ID: 29106563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
Rönn F; Kesek M; Karp K; Henein M; Jensen SM
Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 21712261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes.
Sardu C; Barbieri M; Santamaria M; Giordano V; Sacra C; Paolisso P; Spirito A; Marfella R; Paolisso G; Rizzo MR
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2017 Jun; 16(1):75. PubMed ID: 28599667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transseptal left ventricular endocardial pacing: preliminary experience from a femoral approach with subclavian pull-through.
van Gelder BM; Houthuizen P; Bracke FA
Europace; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1454-8. PubMed ID: 21561904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of bipolar electrode spacing on phrenic nerve stimulation and left ventricular pacing thresholds: an acute canine study.
Biffi M; Foerster L; Eastman W; Eggen M; Grenz NA; Sommer J; De Santo T; Haddad T; Varbaro A; Yang Z
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 5(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 22787012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.
Forleo GB; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Mantica M; Parisi Q; Martino A; Pappalardo A; Sergi D; Tesauro M; Papavasileiou LP; Santini L; Calò L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25504267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-year performance of a preshaped lead for left ventricular stimulation.
Schuchert A; Seidl K; Pfeiffer D; Oltmanns G; Dänschel W; Aydin MA; Paul V
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1610-4. PubMed ID: 15613123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Model-based navigation of left and right ventricular leads to optimal targets for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a single-center feasibility study.
Laksman Z; Yee R; Stirrat J; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Leong-Sit P; Manlucu J; McCarty D; Turkistani Y; Scholl D; Rajchl M; Goela A; Islam A; Thompson RT; Drangova M; White JA
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 7(6):1040-7. PubMed ID: 25221334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reverse ventricular remodeling and long-term survival in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization with surgically versus percutaneously placed left ventricular pacing leads.
Rickard J; Johnston DR; Price J; Tedford R; Baranowski B; Bassiouny M; Cantillon D; Grimm RA; Tang WHW; Varma N; Wilkoff BL
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Mar; 12(3):517-523. PubMed ID: 25460866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study.
Huntjens PR; Walmsley J; Ploux S; Bordachar P; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T; Lumens J
Europace; 2014 Nov; 16 Suppl 4():iv62-iv68. PubMed ID: 25362172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the efficacy of two surgical alternatives for cardiac resynchronization therapy: trans-apical versus epicardial left ventricular pacing.
Mihalcz A; Kassai I; Kardos A; Foldesi C; Theuns D; Szili-Torok T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Feb; 35(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 22017475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.
Auricchio A; Delnoy PP; Butter C; Brachmann J; Van Erven L; Spitzer S; Moccetti T; Seifert M; Markou T; Laszo K; Regoli F;
Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):681-8. PubMed ID: 24497573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.
Auricchio A; Delnoy PP; Regoli F; Seifert M; Markou T; Butter C;
Europace; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1191-7. PubMed ID: 23703364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of pacing configurations, body mass index, and position of coronary sinus lead on frequency of phrenic nerve stimulation and pacing thresholds under cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Seifert M; Schau T; Moeller V; Neuss M; Meyhoefer J; Butter C
Europace; 2010 Jul; 12(7):961-7. PubMed ID: 20444725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Antiarrhythmic effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with triple-site biventricular stimulation.
Ogano M; Iwasaki YK; Tanabe J; Takagi H; Umemoto T; Hayashi M; Miyauchi Y; Mizuno K
Europace; 2013 Oct; 15(10):1491-8. PubMed ID: 23696627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of a novel active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Attain Stability Quad Clinical Study results.
Jackson KP; Faerestrand S; Philippon F; Yee R; Kong MH; Kloppe A; Bongiorni MG; Lee SF; Canby RC; Pouliot E; van Ginneken MME; Crossley GH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 31(5):1147-1154. PubMed ID: 32162757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Left ventricular wall motion analysis to guide management of CRT non-responders.
Nitsche B; Eitel C; Bode K; Wetzel U; Richter S; Döring M; Hindricks G; Piorkowski C; Gaspar T
Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 25825461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.
Forleo GB; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Molfetta AD; Santini L; Romeo F
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20887804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improving left ventricular pacing threshold using retained guidewire technique: a case report.
Yi F; Shen M; Wu F; Yu J; Zhang J; Liu B
Europace; 2010 Dec; 12(12):1792-3. PubMed ID: 20639210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
