These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23339802)

  • 1. The authors' challenge.
    Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jan; 8(9):995. PubMed ID: 23339802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors.
    Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
    Michell B
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.
    Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Apr; 40(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 20486989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
    Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
    Shim EH; Parekh V
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parasitology thanks the Referees of 2011.
    Phillips S
    Parasitology; 2012 Jun; 139(7):825. PubMed ID: 22640992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
    Popp RL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journals tighten up on biosecurity.
    Check E
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):774. PubMed ID: 12594467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The garbage collectors: could a particular sector of author-pays journals become silently acknowledged collectors of scientific waste?
    Moore A
    Bioessays; 2009 Aug; 31(8):821. PubMed ID: 19609967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Financial interests are not the only bias factor.
    Gori GB
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6856):565. PubMed ID: 11595913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
    Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.