These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23341416)

  • 1. A comparison of models to infer the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.
    Kousathanas A; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2013 Apr; 193(4):1197-208. PubMed ID: 23341416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferring Genome-Wide Correlations of Mutation Fitness Effects between Populations.
    Huang X; Fortier AL; Coffman AJ; Struck TJ; Irby MN; James JE; León-Burguete JE; Ragsdale AP; Gutenkunst RN
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Sep; 38(10):4588-4602. PubMed ID: 34043790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
    Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2251-61. PubMed ID: 18073430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.
    Huber CD; Kim BY; Marsden CD; Lohmueller KE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(17):4465-4470. PubMed ID: 28400513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inference of Distribution of Fitness Effects and Proportion of Adaptive Substitutions from Polymorphism Data.
    Tataru P; Mollion M; Glémin S; Bataillon T
    Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 28951530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.
    Bataillon T; Bailey SF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 24891070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.
    Schneider A; Charlesworth B; Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2011 Dec; 189(4):1427-37. PubMed ID: 21954160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Methods for Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects for INDELs and SNPs.
    Barton HJ; Zeng K
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jun; 35(6):1536-1546. PubMed ID: 29635416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.
    Kim BY; Huber CD; Lohmueller KE
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):345-361. PubMed ID: 28249985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. polyDFE: Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects and Properties of Beneficial Mutations from Polymorphism Data.
    Tataru P; Bataillon T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():125-146. PubMed ID: 31975166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolutionarily stable distribution of fitness effects.
    Rice DP; Good BH; Desai MM
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):321-9. PubMed ID: 25762525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Full Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Amino Acid Mutations Across Great Apes.
    Castellano D; Macià MC; Tataru P; Bataillon T; Munch K
    Genetics; 2019 Nov; 213(3):953-966. PubMed ID: 31488516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between but Not Within-Species Variation in the Distribution of Fitness Effects.
    James J; Kastally C; Budde KB; González-Martínez SC; Milesi P; Pyhäjärvi T; Lascoux M;
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Nov; 40(11):. PubMed ID: 37832225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The distribution of mutational effects on fitness in Caenorhabditis elegans inferred from standing genetic variation.
    Gilbert KJ; Zdraljevic S; Cook DE; Cutter AD; Andersen EC; Baer CF
    Genetics; 2022 Jan; 220(1):. PubMed ID: 34791202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inference of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations is affected by single nucleotide polymorphism filtering methods, sample size and population structure.
    Andersson BA; Zhao W; Haller BC; Brännström Å; Wang XR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37340611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data?
    Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Apr; 365(1544):1187-93. PubMed ID: 20308093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hunting for Beneficial Mutations: Conditioning on SIFT Scores When Estimating the Distribution of Fitness Effect of New Mutations.
    Chen J; Bataillon T; Glémin S; Lascoux M
    Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 34180988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations when inferring selection on non-synonymous mutations.
    Zurita AMI; Kyriazis CC; Lohmueller KE
    bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses.
    Wylie CS; Shakhnovich EI
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jun; 108(24):9916-21. PubMed ID: 21610162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA close to protein-coding genes in wild house mice.
    Kousathanas A; Oliver F; Halligan DL; Keightley PD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1183-91. PubMed ID: 21059791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.