These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23341593)

  • 1. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.
    Rand DG; Tarnita CE; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(7):2581-6. PubMed ID: 23341593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of fairness and coalition formation in three-person ultimatum games.
    Nishimura T; Okada A; Shirata Y
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():53-67. PubMed ID: 28257763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empathy leads to fairness.
    Page KM; Nowak MA
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social learning in the ultimatum game.
    Zhang B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74540. PubMed ID: 24023950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
    Nowak MA; Page KM; Sigmund K
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5485):1773-5. PubMed ID: 10976075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random allocation of pies promotes the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wang X; Chen X; Wang L
    Sci Rep; 2014 Apr; 4():4534. PubMed ID: 24686840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theft in an ultimatum game: chimpanzees and bonobos are insensitive to unfairness.
    Kaiser I; Jensen K; Call J; Tomasello M
    Biol Lett; 2012 Dec; 8(6):942-5. PubMed ID: 22896269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do people reject unintended inequity? Responders' rejection in a truncated ultimatum game.
    Ohmura Y; Yamagishi T
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 15941131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolutionary dynamics of group fairness.
    Santos FP; Santos FC; Paiva A; Pacheco JM
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Aug; 378():96-102. PubMed ID: 25936348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.
    Ichinose G; Sayama H
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():5104. PubMed ID: 24869922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game.
    Barclay P; Stoller B
    Biol Lett; 2014 May; 10(5):20140213. PubMed ID: 24850897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.
    Sánchez-Amaro A; Rossano F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 288(1962):20211937. PubMed ID: 34727713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game.
    Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fairness evolution in the ultimatum game is a function of reward size.
    Härdling R
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):720-4. PubMed ID: 17350654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game.
    Wu T; Fu F; Zhang Y; Wang L
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1550. PubMed ID: 23528986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equal status in Ultimatum Games promotes rational sharing.
    Han X; Cao S; Bao JZ; Wang WX; Zhang B; Gao ZY; Sánchez A
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1222. PubMed ID: 29352130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.