327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23342336)
1. Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation.
Ariani N; Visser A; van Oort RP; Kusdhany L; Rahardjo TB; Krom BP; van der Mei HC; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 23342336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention systems used in maxillofacial prostheses: A review.
Diken Türksayar AA; Saglam SA; Bulut AC
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1629-1634. PubMed ID: 31793467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survey of currently used materials for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
Montgomery PC; Kiat-Amnuay S
J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 20002975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists' and technologists' attitudes and opinions.
Hatamleh MM; Haylock C; Watson J; Watts DC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(12):1186-92. PubMed ID: 20832245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fate of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses: life span and aftercare.
Visser A; Raghoebar GM; van Oort RP; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 18416416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey on the quality of life.
Dings JPJ; Merkx MAW; de Clonie Maclennan-Naphausen MTP; van de Pol P; Maal TJJ; Meijer GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):780-786. PubMed ID: 30414646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Contemporary Review of the Role of Facial Prostheses in Complex Facial Reconstruction.
Slijepcevic AA; Afshari A; Vitale AE; Couch SM; Jeanpierre LM; Chi JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Feb; 151(2):288e-298e. PubMed ID: 36696329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention systems for extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic implants: a critical review.
Cobein MV; Coto NP; Crivello Junior O; Lemos JBD; Vieira LM; Pimentel ML; Byrne HJ; Dias RB
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 55(8):763-769. PubMed ID: 28552609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthetic management of mid-facial defect with magnet-retained silicone prosthesis.
Buzayan MM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 23625838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of implant anchorage on midface prostheses.
Arcuri MR; LaVelle WE; Fyler A; Funk G
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 9399193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual Treatment Planning for Implant-Retained Nasal Prosthesis: A Clinical Report.
Buzayan MM; Yunus NB; Oon HK; Tawfiq O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):e255-e258. PubMed ID: 29140385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-supported facial prostheses.
Baima RF
J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996; 78(4):50-4, 56-64. PubMed ID: 9520655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic reconstruction of a patient with an acquired nasal defect using extraoral implants and a CAD/CAM copy-milled bar.
Vera C; Barrero C; Shockley W; Rothenberger S; Minsley G; Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):582-7. PubMed ID: 25041262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rehabilitation of a Complex Oro-Facial Defect by Modified Prosthetic Approach.
Singh SV; Aggarwal H; Shah V; Kumar P; Arya D
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Nov; 27(11):730-732. PubMed ID: 29132490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions.
Hooper SM; Westcott T; Evans PL; Bocca AP; Jagger DC
J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15733133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillofacial prosthetics and digital technologies: Cross-sectional study of healthcare service provision, patient attitudes, and opinions.
Hatamleh MM; Hatamlah HM; Nuseir A
J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 37218377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of the computerized tools and digital techniques applied to fabricate nasal, auricular, orbital and ocular prostheses for facial defect rehabilitation.
Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Rajion ZA; Alam MK
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 31610244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation using extraoral implants.
Leonardi A; Buonaccorsi S; Pellacchia V; Moricca LM; Indrizzi E; Fini G
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):398-405. PubMed ID: 18362717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Application of negative molds technology based on three-dimensional printing in digital maxillofacial prostheses].
Gu XY; Chen XB; Jiao T; Zhang FQ; Jiang XQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):336-341. PubMed ID: 28613053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
