These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23342881)

  • 1. A randomized comparison of microtip and air-charged catheter for the measurement of maximum urethral closure pressure.
    Mueller MM; Baumann MU; Mueller MD; Kuhn A
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Aug; 83(8):586-9. PubMed ID: 23342881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial.
    Zehnder P; Roth B; Burkhard FC; Kessler TM
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1013-7. PubMed ID: 18639301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catheters.
    Elser DM; London W; Fantl JA; McBride MA; Beck RP
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1999; 10(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 10614972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements.
    Kuhn A; Nager CW; Hawkins E; Schulz J; Stanton SL
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 17131168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double-lumen perfusion catheters in women with genuine stress incontinence.
    Wang AC; Chen MC
    BJOG; 2002 Mar; 109(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 11950188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High definition urethral pressure profilometry: Evaluating a novel microtip catheter.
    Klünder M; Amend B; Vaegler M; Kelp A; Feuer R; Sievert KD; Stenzl A; Sawodny O; Ederer M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):888-894. PubMed ID: 26207994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between water-filled and air-charged urodynamic catheters for determining the urethral pressure profile in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction patients.
    Zhao H; Liao L; Deng H; Wang Y
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Aug; 38(6):1760-1766. PubMed ID: 31215070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the reproducibility of high definition urethral pressure profilometry and its correlation with an air-charged system.
    Klünder M; Amend B; Sawodny O; Stenzl A; Ederer M; Kelp A; Sievert KD; Feuer R
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 27574912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Air-charged and microtransducer urodynamic catheters in the evaluation of urethral function.
    Pollak JT; Neimark M; Connor JT; Davila GW
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(2):124-8; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 15014940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of maximum urethral closure pressure with Valsalva leak point pressure using air-charged urodynamic catheters.
    White T; Kawasaki A; Ross RV; Adam RA; Duong TH
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1109-12. PubMed ID: 19444363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) be used to predict outcome of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence?
    Harris N; Swithinbank L; Hayek SA; Yang Q; Abrams P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Nov; 30(8):1609-12. PubMed ID: 21780164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies.
    Culligan PJ; Goldberg RP; Blackhurst DW; Sasso K; Koduri S; Sand PK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 98(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 11506841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multicentered comparison of measurements obtained with microtip and external water pressure transducers.
    Hundley AF; Brown MB; Brubaker L; Cundiff GW; Kreder K; Lotze P; Richter HE; Zyczynski H; Weber AM; Visco AG
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jun; 17(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 16284710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vesical instability: urodynamic parameters by microtip transducer catheters.
    Hebert DB; Ostergard DR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 60(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 6889712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The correlation of urethral resistance pressure with maximum urethral closure pressure and stress incontinence.
    Kuhn A; Kuhn P; Dreher E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 17618730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decrease in urethral pressure following repeated cough efforts: a new concept for pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence.
    Deffieux X; Hubeaux K; Porcher R; Ismael SS; Raibaut P; Amarenco G
    Int J Urol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17956530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of urethral retro-resistance pressure to urodynamic measurements and incontinence severity.
    Slack M; Culligan P; Tracey M; Hunsicker K; Patel B; Sumeray M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 14983420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Changes in values of urethral closure pressure and its position after Burch colposuspension--predictive value of MUCP and VLPP for successful rate of this operation].
    Martan A; Masata J; Svabík K; Drahorádová P; Pavlíková M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 16768049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Changes in values of urethral closure pressure and its position after TVT operation--predictive value of MUCP and VLPP for successful rate of this operation].
    Martan A; Masata J; Svabík K; Drahorádová P; Pavlíková M; Hlásenská J
    Ceska Gynekol; 2005 Sep; 70(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 16180798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of urethral pressure profilometry in the female incontinent patient: a prospective trial with an 8-channel urethral catheter.
    Haeusler G; Tempfer C; Heinzl H; Sam C; Hefler L; Hanzal E; Koelbl H
    Urology; 1998 Dec; 52(6):1113-7. PubMed ID: 9836565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.