445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23343209)
1. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
Westgate PM
Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; DiazOrdaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3092-3109. PubMed ID: 28557022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The mixed model for repeated measures for cluster randomized trials: a simulation study investigating bias and type I error with missing continuous data.
Bell ML; Rabe BA
Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):148. PubMed ID: 32033617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of analytical methods for overdispersed counts in cluster randomized trials: sample size, degree of clustering and imbalance.
Durán Pacheco G; Hattendorf J; Colford JM; Mäusezahl D; Smith T
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2989-3011. PubMed ID: 19672840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GEEMAEE: A SAS macro for the analysis of correlated outcomes based on GEE and finite-sample adjustments with application to cluster randomized trials.
Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Li F; Turner EL; Toles M; Rathouz PJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Mar; 230():107362. PubMed ID: 36709555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.
Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing appropriate methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of cluster randomized trials.
Gomes M; Ng ES; Grieve R; Nixon R; Carpenter J; Thompson SG
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(2):350-61. PubMed ID: 22016450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Li P; Redden DT
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A mixed model-based variance estimator for marginal model analyses of cluster randomized trials.
Braun TM
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 17623344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of imputation strategies in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes.
Caille A; Leyrat C; Giraudeau B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2650-2669. PubMed ID: 24713160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.
Gomes M; Díaz-Ordaz K; Grieve R; Kenward MG
Med Decis Making; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1051-63. PubMed ID: 23913915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
Liu J; Xiong C; Liu L; Wang G; Jingqin L; Gao F; Chen L; Li Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2021 Mar; 31(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 32970522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values.
White IR; Carlin JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2920-31. PubMed ID: 20842622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
