These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23343359)

  • 1. The spinal cord independence measure: how much change is clinically significant for spinal cord injury subjects.
    Scivoletto G; Tamburella F; Laurenza L; Molinari M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 35(21):1808-13. PubMed ID: 23343359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do spinal cord injury patients think of their improvement? A study of the minimal clinically important difference of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III.
    Corallo V; Torre M; Ferrara G; Guerra F; Nicosia G; Romanelli E; Lopopolo A; Onesta MP; Fiore P; Falcone R; Bonavita J; Molinari M; Scivoletto G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Aug; 53(4):508-515. PubMed ID: 28084060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distribution-based estimates of clinically significant changes in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor and sensory scores.
    Scivoletto G; Tamburella F; Laurenza L; Molinari M
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 Jun; 49(3):373-84. PubMed ID: 23486305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in activity after a complete spinal cord injury as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II).
    Wirth B; van Hedel HJ; Kometer B; Dietz V; Curt A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 17761810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in activity after a complete spinal cord injury as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II).
    Wirth B; van Hedel HJ; Kometer B; Dietz V; Curt A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 18496904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fighting for each segment: estimating the clinical value of cervical and thoracic segments in SCI.
    van Hedel HJ; Curt A
    J Neurotrauma; 2006 Nov; 23(11):1621-31. PubMed ID: 17115909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between motor recovery and independence after sensorimotor-complete cervical spinal cord injury.
    Kramer JL; Lammertse DP; Schubert M; Curt A; Steeves JD
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2012; 26(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 22647878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SCIM III is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions.
    Bluvshtein V; Front L; Itzkovich M; Aidinoff E; Gelernter I; Hart J; Biering-Soerensen F; Weeks C; Laramee MT; Craven C; Hitzig SL; Glaser E; Zeilig G; Aito S; Scivoletto G; Mecci M; Chadwick RJ; El Masry WS; Osman A; Glass CA; Silva P; Soni BM; Gardner BP; Savic G; Bergström EM; Catz A
    Spinal Cord; 2011 Feb; 49(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 20820178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability, validation and reproducibility of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III) in patients with non-traumatic spinal cord lesions.
    Almeida Cd; Coelho JN; Riberto M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 38(22):2229-34. PubMed ID: 26800790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional outcome of patients 12 and 48 weeks after acute traumatic tetraplegia and paraplegia: data analysis from 2004-2009.
    Högel F; Mach O; Maier D
    Spinal Cord; 2012 Jul; 50(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 22249330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study.
    Itzkovich M; Gelernter I; Biering-Sorensen F; Weeks C; Laramee MT; Craven BC; Tonack M; Hitzig SL; Glaser E; Zeilig G; Aito S; Scivoletto G; Mecci M; Chadwick RJ; El Masry WS; Osman A; Glass CA; Silva P; Soni BM; Gardner BP; Savic G; Bergström EM; Bluvshtein V; Ronen J; Catz A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 29(24):1926-33. PubMed ID: 17852230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Injury severity as primary predictor of outcome in acute spinal cord injury: retrospective results from a large multicenter clinical trial.
    Coleman WP; Geisler FH
    Spine J; 2004; 4(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 15246294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pain severity and mobility one year after spinal cord injury: a multicenter, cross-sectional study.
    Marcondes BF; Sreepathi S; Markowski J; Nguyen D; Stock SR; Carvalho S; Tate D; Zafonte R; Morse LR; Fregni F
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Oct; 52(5):630-636. PubMed ID: 26616359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new grading for easy and concise description of functional status after spinal cord lesions.
    Bluvshtein V; Front L; Itzkovich M; Benjamini Y; Galili T; Gelernter I; Aidinoff E; Hart J; Tesio L; Biering-Sorensen F; Weeks C; Laramee MT; Craven C; Hitzig SL; Glaser E; Zeilig G; Aito S; Scivoletto G; Mecci M; Chadwick RJ; El Masry WS; Osman A; Glass CA; Silva P; Soni BM; Gardner BP; Savic G; Bergström EM; Catz A
    Spinal Cord; 2012 Jan; 50(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 21808258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of training intensity on physical capacity, lipid profile and insulin sensitivity in early rehabilitation of spinal cord injured individuals.
    de Groot PC; Hjeltnes N; Heijboer AC; Stal W; Birkeland K
    Spinal Cord; 2003 Dec; 41(12):673-9. PubMed ID: 14639446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. United States (US) multi-center study to assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III).
    Anderson KD; Acuff ME; Arp BG; Backus D; Chun S; Fisher K; Fjerstad JE; Graves DE; Greenwald K; Groah SL; Harkema SJ; Horton JA; Huang MN; Jennings M; Kelley KS; Kessler SM; Kirshblum S; Koltenuk S; Linke M; Ljungberg I; Nagy J; Nicolini L; Roach MJ; Salles S; Scelza WM; Read MS; Reeves RK; Scott MD; Tansey KE; Theis JL; Tolfo CZ; Whitney M; Williams CD; Winter CM; Zanca JM
    Spinal Cord; 2011 Aug; 49(8):880-5. PubMed ID: 21445081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trajectories in the course of body mass index after spinal cord injury.
    de Groot S; Post MW; Hoekstra T; Valent LJ; Faber WX; van der Woude LH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 95(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 24534297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the outcome in acute spinal cord ischaemia different from that in traumatic spinal cord injury? A cross-sectional analysis of the neurological and functional outcome in a cohort of 93 paraplegics.
    Pouw MH; Hosman AJ; van Kampen A; Hirschfeld S; Thietje R; van de Meent H
    Spinal Cord; 2011 Feb; 49(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 20805834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expected spinal cord independence measure, third version, scores for various neurological levels after complete spinal cord lesions.
    Aidinoff E; Front L; Itzkovich M; Bluvshtein V; Gelernter I; Hart J; Biering-Sørensen F; Weeks C; Laramee MT; Craven C; Hitzig SL; Glaser E; Zeilig G; Aito S; Scivoletto G; Mecci M; Chadwick RJ; El Masry WS; Osman A; Glass CA; Soni BM; Gardner BP; Savic G; Bergström EM; Silva P; Catz A
    Spinal Cord; 2011 Aug; 49(8):893-6. PubMed ID: 21483443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury.
    Schwartz I; Sajina A; Neeb M; Fisher I; Katz-Luerer M; Meiner Z
    Spinal Cord; 2011 Oct; 49(10):1062-7. PubMed ID: 21625239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.