These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23344348)

  • 1. Grant applications: Undo NIH policy to ease effect of cuts.
    Benezra R
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7433):480. PubMed ID: 23344348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An unhealthy obsession.
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):7. PubMed ID: 23236611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
    Roy HK
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extra scrutiny for 'grandee grantees'.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7386):450-1. PubMed ID: 22358805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Australian cuts rile researchers.
    Cressey D
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7521):148-9. PubMed ID: 25297411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science agencies prepare for cuts.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):158-9. PubMed ID: 23407517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in funding for research on pain: a report on the National Institutes Of Health grant awards over the years 2003 to 2007.
    Bradshaw DH; Empy C; Davis P; Lipschitz D; Dalton P; Nakamura Y; Chapman CR
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1077-87, 1087.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19038770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The best-kept secrets to winning grants.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7655):399-402. PubMed ID: 28541333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grants fall victim to NIH success.
    Giles J; Wadman M
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7114):894-5. PubMed ID: 17065999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science funding: Duel to the death.
    Bhattacharya A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):20-2. PubMed ID: 22859184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH grant limits rile biomedical research community.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7653):142-143. PubMed ID: 28492269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of NIH funds placed under a spotlight.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7059):601. PubMed ID: 16193003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No more third time lucky.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Funding: flirting with disaster.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7455):527-8. PubMed ID: 23814812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It is time to update US biomedical funding.
    Grinnell F
    Nature; 2013 Sep; 501(7466):137. PubMed ID: 24025803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grants: Funder storm.
    Shen H
    Nature; 2014 Apr; 508(7497):555-6. PubMed ID: 24822279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH firm on grant application rules.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):558. PubMed ID: 21455147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.