These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23344519)

  • 1. Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/pelvic CT: a phantom study.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader R; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Mar; 48(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 23344519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A phantom study of the performance of model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose chest and abdominal CT: When are benefits maximized?
    Moloney F; Twomey M; James K; Kavanagh RG; Fama D; O'Neill S; Grey TM; Moore N; Murphy MJ; O'Connor OJ; Maher MM
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 30292504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go?
    Husarik DB; Marin D; Samei E; Richard S; Chen B; Jaffe TA; Bashir MR; Nelson RC
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Aug; 47(8):468-74. PubMed ID: 22717881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of model-based iterative reconstruction on image quality for low-dose computed tomographic angiography of the thoracic aorta in a Swine model.
    Caywood D; Paxton B; Boll D; Nelson R; Kim C; Lowry C; Seaman D; Roos JE; Hurwitz LM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 25474144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image Quality Assessment in Torso Phantom Comparing Effects of Varying Automatic Current Modulation with Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in CT.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Olubaniyi B; Loader R; Riordan RD; Williams MP; Roobottom CA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2012 Dec; 43(4):228-238. PubMed ID: 31052009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
    Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
    Vachha B; Brodoefel H; Wilcox C; Hackney DB; Moonis G
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2222-6. PubMed ID: 24016832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.
    Marin D; Nelson RC; Schindera ST; Richard S; Youngblood RS; Yoshizumi TT; Samei E
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 20032149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.