These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23345195)

  • 1. Reduction of the impact of multiple uncertain conductivity values on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupré L
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2013 Mar; 29(3):363-79. PubMed ID: 23345195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced conductivity dependence method for increase of dipole localization accuracy in the EEG inverse problem.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupre L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1430-40. PubMed ID: 21257364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subspace electrode selection methodology for the reduction of the effect of uncertain conductivity values in the EEG dipole localization: a simulation study using a patient-specific head model.
    Crevecoeur G; Restrepo VM; Staelens S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1963-86. PubMed ID: 22421525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subspace electrode selection methodology for EEG multiple source localization error reduction due to uncertain conductivity values.
    Crevecoeur G; Yitembe B; Dupre L; Van Keer R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6191-4. PubMed ID: 24111154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving lesion conductivity estimate by means of EEG source localization sensitivity to model parameter.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11896347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A global sensitivity analysis of three- and four-layer EEG conductivity models.
    Vallaghé S; Clerc M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):988-95. PubMed ID: 19272874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of tissue conductivity changes on the EEG signal in the human brain: a simulation study.
    Jochmann T; Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 20888205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
    Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2113-22. PubMed ID: 15605858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
    Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis.
    Ferree TC; Eriksen KJ; Tucker DM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Dec; 47(12):1584-92. PubMed ID: 11125593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Lemahieu I; Van de Walle R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.