These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23347849)

  • 1. Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23347849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.
    Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 18394536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
    Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews.
    Franco JVA; Garrote VL; Escobar Liquitay CM; Vietto V
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 29761662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology.
    Vassar M; Atakpo P; Kash MJ
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):302-304. PubMed ID: 27822152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects.
    Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jan; 6():3. PubMed ID: 16441876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Wright K; Sterrantino C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():125-133. PubMed ID: 27259470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Briscoe S
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interventions for bronchiectasis: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Welsh EJ; Evans DJ; Fowler SJ; Spencer S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 2015(7):CD010337. PubMed ID: 26171905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
    Relevo R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. PubMed ID: 22648672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing number of databases searched in systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 1994 and 2014.
    Lam MT; McDiarmid M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 27822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.