These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23347856)

  • 1. A prenotification letter increased initial response, whereas sender did not affect response rates.
    Koopman L; Donselaar LC; Rademakers JJ; Hendriks M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 23347856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing response to a postal survey of sedentary patients - a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN45665423].
    Harrison RA; Cock D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 15537429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattellari M; Zwar N; Worthington JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 22445084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does a deadline improve men's participation in self-administered health surveys? A randomized controlled trial in general practice.
    Gattellari M; Ward JE
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Dec; 26(4):384-7. PubMed ID: 15598859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of personalized prenotification on response rates to an electronic survey.
    Hart AM; Brennan CW; Sym D; Larson E
    West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18515752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prenotification but not envelope teaser increased response rates in a bulimia nervosa mental health literacy survey: A randomized controlled trial.
    McLean SA; Paxton SJ; Massey R; Mond JM; Rodgers B; Hay PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 24411313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prenotification had no additional effect on the response rate and survey quality: a randomized trial.
    Xie Y; Ho SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1422-6. PubMed ID: 23742789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial.
    Hickey M; McIntyre L; Taljaard M; Abdulaziz K; Yadav K; Hickey C; Perry JJ
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e052843. PubMed ID: 34556517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Barriers to adherence to preventive services reminder letters: the patient's perspective.
    Ornstein SM; Musham C; Reid A; Jenkins RG; Zemp LD; Garr DR
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Feb; 36(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 8426139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics.
    Christensen AI; Ekholm O; Glümer C; Andreasen AH; Hvidberg MF; Kristensen PL; Larsen FB; Ortiz B; Juel K
    Scand J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 40(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 22786925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors in errors of omission on a self-administered paper questionnaire.
    McBride B; Cantor D
    J Health Commun; 2010; 15 Suppl 3():102-16. PubMed ID: 21154087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine.
    Rosser WW; McDowell I; Newell C
    CMAJ; 1991 Oct; 145(7):807-14. PubMed ID: 1913409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians.
    Dykema J; Stevenson J; Day B; Sellers SL; Bonham VL
    Eval Health Prof; 2011 Dec; 34(4):434-47. PubMed ID: 21613242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial.
    Harris IA; Khoo OK; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Rae H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):609-10. PubMed ID: 18471665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.
    Byrne CM; Harrison JD; Young JM; Selby WS; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1312-4. PubMed ID: 17998087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mode of delivery, but not questionnaire length, affected response in an epidemiological study of eating-disordered behavior.
    Mond JM; Rodgers B; Hay PJ; Owen C; Beumont PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1167-71. PubMed ID: 15567633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving influenza vaccination rates by targeting individuals not seeking early seasonal vaccination.
    Minor DS; Eubanks JT; Butler KR; Wofford MR; Penman AD; Replogle WH
    Am J Med; 2010 Nov; 123(11):1031-5. PubMed ID: 20843496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using different approaches to conducting postal questionnaires affected response rates and cost-efficiency.
    Stenhammar C; Bokström P; Edlund B; Sarkadi A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1137-43. PubMed ID: 21524566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Format and readability of an enhanced invitation letter did not affect participation rates in a cancer registry-based study: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hall AE; Sanson-Fisher RW; Lynagh MC; Threlfall T; D'Este CA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23102853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.