These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23347916)

  • 1. Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.
    Lina IA; Lauer AM
    Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():73-9. PubMed ID: 23347916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-frequency auditory filter shape for the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin.
    Lemonds DW; Au WW; Vlachos SA; Nachtigall PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1222-8. PubMed ID: 22894241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.
    Burton JA; Dylla ME; Ramachandran R
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():73-80. PubMed ID: 29223930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory filter shapes for the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the white whale (Delphinapterus leucas) derived with notched noise.
    Finneran JJ; Schlundt CE; Carder DA; Ridgway SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):322-8. PubMed ID: 12141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid estimation of high-parameter auditory-filter shapes.
    Shen Y; Sivakumar R; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1857-68. PubMed ID: 25324086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency-resolution measurements with notched noises for clinical purposes.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 1994 Jun; 15(3):240-55. PubMed ID: 8076722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory filter shapes of CBA/CaJ mice: behavioral assessments.
    May BJ; Kimar S; Prosen CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):321-30. PubMed ID: 16875229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of Bayesian Active Learning to the Estimation of Auditory Filter Shapes Using the Notched-Noise Method.
    Schlittenlacher J; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520952992. PubMed ID: 33073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of auditory filter shapes obtained with notched-noise and noise-tone maskers.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; van der Heijden M; Houtsma AJ; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1175-82. PubMed ID: 7876439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioural estimates of auditory filter widths in ferrets using notched-noise maskers.
    Alves-Pinto A; Sollini J; Wells T; Sumner CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):EL19-24. PubMed ID: 26936579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L; Schade G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method.
    Stone MA; Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Dec; 26(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 1292815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory filter shapes at high frequencies.
    Zhou B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1935-42. PubMed ID: 7593917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss.
    Stapells DR; Gravel JS; Martin BA
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 8549892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise.
    Pratt H; Bleich N
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 6175503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking.
    Bacon SP; Repovsch-Duffey JL; Liu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 12141348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.