These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23347964)

  • 1. On the relationship between learning strategy and feedback processing in the weather prediction task--Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rustemeier M; Schwabe L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 23347964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning.
    Kobza S; Thoma P; Daum I; Bellebaum C
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 225(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 21846482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of interpersonal competition on monitoring internal and external error feedback.
    Van Meel CS; Van Heijningen CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 20074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental differences in learning and error processing: evidence from ERPs.
    Eppinger B; Mock B; Kray J
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Sep; 46(5):1043-53. PubMed ID: 19497006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.
    Bellebaum C; Daum I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 27(7):1823-35. PubMed ID: 18380674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes in healthy older subjects.
    Bellebaum C; Kobza S; Thiele S; Daum I
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 21280937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of task difficulty on feedback processing in children.
    Arbel Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():1-7. PubMed ID: 32315655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transient and sustained ERP activity related to feedback processing in the probabilistic selection task.
    West R; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():1-12. PubMed ID: 29499240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It was not MY fault: event-related brain potentials in active and observational learning from feedback.
    Bellebaum C; Kobza S; Thiele S; Daum I
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Dec; 20(12):2874-83. PubMed ID: 20308202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory.
    Luque D; López FJ; Marco-Pallares J; Càmara E; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 21981667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Error-related negativities elicited by monetary loss and cues that predict loss.
    Dunning JP; Hajcak G
    Neuroreport; 2007 Nov; 18(17):1875-8. PubMed ID: 18090330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Valence-separated representation of reward prediction error in feedback-related negativity and positivity.
    Bai Y; Katahira K; Ohira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Feb; 26(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feedback timing modulates interactions between feedback processing and memory encoding: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Höltje G; Mecklinger A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 20(2):250-264. PubMed ID: 31900874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feedback processing in hypothesis testing: a Laplacian ERP study.
    Carbonnell L; Caverni JP; Vidal F
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Mar; 48(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 20636294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Neurophysiological examination of quality of learning in a feedback-based learning task.
    Arbel Y; Wu H
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):13-20. PubMed ID: 27713069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To choose or to avoid: age differences in learning from positive and negative feedback.
    Eppinger B; Kray J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 19925176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The feedback-related negativity indexes prediction error in active but not observational learning.
    Burnside R; Fischer AG; Ullsperger M
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13389. PubMed ID: 31054155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.