96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23348425)
1. Comparison and evaluation of indicator dilution models for bolus of ultrasound contrast agents.
Harabis V; Kolar R; Mezl M; Jirik R
Physiol Meas; 2013 Feb; 34(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 23348425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
Gauthier TP; Chebil M; Peronneau P; Lassau N
Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21722933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results.
Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The precision of DCE-MRI using the tissue homogeneity model with continuous formulation of the perfusion parameters.
Bartoš M; Jiřík R; Kratochvíla J; Standara M; Starčuk Z; Taxt T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 24636570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of quantitative perfusion parameters by dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography using a deconvolution method: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Gauthier M; Tabarout F; Leguerney I; Polrot M; Pitre S; Peronneau P; Lassau N
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Apr; 31(4):595-608. PubMed ID: 22441917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perfusion parameters derived from bolus-tracking perfusion imaging are immune to tracer recirculation.
Kosior JC; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):753-6. PubMed ID: 20187222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calculation of intravascular signal in dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI using adaptive complex independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Chopra R; Martel AL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):699-710. PubMed ID: 23247848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the physical and stochastic representation of an indicator dilution curve as a gamma variate.
Mischi M; den Boer JA; Korsten HH
Physiol Meas; 2008 Mar; 29(3):281-94. PubMed ID: 18367805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the possibility of non-invasive multilayer temperature estimation using soft-computing methods.
Teixeira CA; Pereira WC; Ruano AE; Ruano MG
Ultrasonics; 2010 Jan; 50(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 19695653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved modelling of ultrasound contrast agent diminution for blood perfusion analysis.
Kier C; Meyer-Wiethe K; Seidel G; Mertins A
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):935-42. PubMed ID: 20426201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the a priori identifiability of the two-compartment distributed parameter model from residual tracer data acquired by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.
Koh TS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):340-4. PubMed ID: 18232378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method to expedite data acquisition for multiple spatial-temporal analyses of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Wilkening W; Ermert H
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Mar; 56(3):507-19. PubMed ID: 19411210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-parameter ultrasound transmission tomography of biological media.
Opielinski KJ; Gudra T
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e295-302. PubMed ID: 17005227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Quaia E
Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):604-15. PubMed ID: 20927527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization.
Kim JK; Hong SS; Choi YJ; Park SH; Ahn H; Kim CS; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 16200542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging the distribution of magnetic nanoparticles with ultrasound.
Norton SJ; Vo-Dinh T
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 17518060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of renal perfusion: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Winter JD; St Lawrence KS; Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Sep; 34(3):608-15. PubMed ID: 21761490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
