193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23348719)
1. Influence of PET reconstruction parameters on the TrueX algorithm. A combined phantom and patient study.
Knäusl B; Rausch IF; Bergmann H; Dudczak R; Hirtl A; Georg D
Nuklearmedizin; 2013; 52(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23348719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PET based volume segmentation with emphasis on the iterative TrueX algorithm.
Knäusl B; Hirtl A; Dobrozemsky G; Bergmann H; Kletter K; Dudczak R; Georg D
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 21251804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Lasnon C; Desmonts C; Quak E; Gervais R; Do P; Dubos-Arvis C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):985-96. PubMed ID: 23564036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.
Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET.
Belhassen S; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1309-24. PubMed ID: 20384268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dependence of image quality on acquisition time for the PET/CT Biograph mCT.
Molina-Duran F; Dinter D; Schoenahl F; Schoenberg SO; Glatting G
Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 23561551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial].
Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of PET reconstruction technique and matrix size on qualitative and quantitative assessment of lung lesions on [18F]-FDG-PET: A prospective study in 37 cancer patients.
Riegler G; Karanikas G; Rausch I; Hirtl A; El-Rabadi K; Marik W; Pivec C; Weber M; Prosch H; Mayerhoefer M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():20-26. PubMed ID: 28583635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: threshold contouring and lesion volumes.
Ford EC; Kinahan PE; Hanlon L; Alessio A; Rajendran J; Schwartz DL; Phillips M
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4280-8. PubMed ID: 17153406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of image-space resolution modeling for studies with the high-resolution research tomograph.
Sureau FC; Reader AJ; Comtat C; Leroy C; Ribeiro MJ; Buvat I; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 18511844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR-OSEM.
Wiant D; Gersh JA; Bennett M; Bourland JD
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1169-82. PubMed ID: 20384254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method for on-site measurements of the effective spatial resolution in PET image volumes reconstructed with OSEM and Gaussian post-filters.
Skretting A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 20164108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
