These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23349212)

  • 1. Graphlet-based measures are suitable for biological network comparison.
    Hayes W; Sun K; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 23349212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Common Neighbors Extension of the Sticky Model for PPI Networks Evaluated by Global and Local Graphlet Similarity.
    Maharaj S; Qian T; Ohiba Z; Hayes W
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 32809943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of tissue/disease specific integrated networks using directed graphlet signatures.
    Sonmez AB; Can T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 4):135. PubMed ID: 28361704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient estimation of graphlet frequency distributions in protein-protein interaction networks.
    Przulj N; Corneil DG; Jurisica I
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):974-80. PubMed ID: 16452112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How threshold behaviour affects the use of subgraphs for network comparison.
    Rito T; Wang Z; Deane CM; Reinert G
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 26(18):i611-7. PubMed ID: 20823329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution.
    Przulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e177-83. PubMed ID: 17237089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GraphCrunch 2: Software tool for network modeling, alignment and clustering.
    Kuchaiev O; Stevanović A; Hayes W; Pržulj N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():24. PubMed ID: 21244715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proper evaluation of alignment-free network comparison methods.
    Yaveroğlu ÖN; Milenković T; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2697-704. PubMed ID: 25810431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RedNemo: topology-based PPI network reconstruction via repeated diffusion with neighborhood modifications.
    Alkan F; Erten C
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 27797764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graphlet Laplacians for topology-function and topology-disease relationships.
    Windels SFL; Malod-Dognin N; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5226-5234. PubMed ID: 31192358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling interactome: scale-free or geometric?
    Przulj N; Corneil DG; Jurisica I
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3508-15. PubMed ID: 15284103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SiPAN: simultaneous prediction and alignment of protein-protein interaction networks.
    Alkan F; Erten C
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(14):2356-63. PubMed ID: 25788620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative network analysis via differential graphlet communities.
    Wong SW; Cercone N; Jurisica I
    Proteomics; 2015 Jan; 15(2-3):608-17. PubMed ID: 25283527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting a geometric graph to a protein-protein interaction network.
    Higham DJ; Rasajski M; Przulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 18344248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. L-GRAAL: Lagrangian graphlet-based network aligner.
    Malod-Dognin N; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2182-9. PubMed ID: 25725498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IncGraph: Incremental graphlet counting for topology optimisation.
    Cannoodt R; Ruyssinck J; Ramon J; De Preter K; Saeys Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195997. PubMed ID: 29698494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrative approach to modeling biological networks.
    Memisevic V; Milenkovic T; Przulj N
    J Integr Bioinform; 2010 Mar; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 20375453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dense graphlet statistics of protein interaction and random networks.
    Colak R; Hormozdiari F; Moser F; Schönhuth A; Holman J; Ester M; Sahinalp SC
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2009; ():178-89. PubMed ID: 19213135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A coclustering approach for mining large protein-protein interaction networks.
    Pizzuti C; Rombo SE
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(3):717-30. PubMed ID: 22201069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of human disease genes from interactome network using graphlet interaction.
    Wang XD; Huang JL; Yang L; Wei DQ; Qi YX; Jiang ZL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86142. PubMed ID: 24465923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.