These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles". Miller DR Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Ego Has Landed! What Can Be Done About Research Misconduct, Scandals, and Spins? Thompson DR; Clark AM Am J Med; 2019 May; 132(5):552-553. PubMed ID: 30550755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Preventing Publication of Falsified and Fabricated Data: Roles of Scientists, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers. Korte SM; van der Heyden MA J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 69(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 27851697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrity measures take its toll: Introducing a complete supplement issue with retractions only. Behl C J Cell Biochem; 2021 Nov; 122 Suppl 1():S7. PubMed ID: 34715723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retracted science and the retraction index. Fang FC; Casadevall A Infect Immun; 2011 Oct; 79(10):3855-9. PubMed ID: 21825063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Publishing ethics--about intermediating science understandably and reliably]. Riis P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jul; 130(13):1359-61. PubMed ID: 20596120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Unacceptable practice in our field. Haddad FS Bone Joint J; 2020 Nov; 102-B(11):1429-1430. PubMed ID: 33135453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Qi X; Deng H; Guo X Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors. De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why? Else H Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor. Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans]. Bonnet F; Samama CM Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor: a vicious circle that is detrimental to science. Metze K Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2010; 65(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 21120290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sanctions for research misconduct in cardiothoracic surgery journals. Sade RM; J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 152(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 27530635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research? Suhrbier A; Poland GA Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31(51):6041-2. PubMed ID: 24184289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (excerpts). International Committee of Medical Journal Editors J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(3):23-30. PubMed ID: 25951680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]