172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23350561)
1. Local recurrence after prone vs supine abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Anderin C; Granath F; Martling A; Holm T
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 15(7):812-5. PubMed ID: 23350561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.
Tayyab M; Sharma A; Ragg JL; Macdonald AW; Gunn J; Hartley JE; Monson JR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Mar; 55(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 22469799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome.
Martijnse IS; Dudink RL; West NP; Wasowicz D; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van Lijnschoten I; Martijn H; Lemmens VE; van de Velde CJ; Nagtegaal ID; Quirke P; Rutten HJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):786-93. PubMed ID: 21861224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Bock D; Haglind E
Ann Surg; 2016 Mar; 263(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 25906414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.
Asplund D; Haglind E; Angenete E
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 22221401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local control and survival after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced or low rectal cancer.
Palmer G; Anderin C; Martling A; Holm T
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jul; 16(7):527-32. PubMed ID: 24602235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome.
Zhou X; Sun T; Xie H; Zhang Y; Zeng H; Fu W
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 25704132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prone Versus Supine Position in Abdominoperineal Resection: Outcomes in the Laparoscopic Era.
Ferrari C; Martinez Sanchez C; Bollo J; Hernandez P; Cambeiro L; Codina C; Targarona E
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 33646052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Perdawood SK; Lund T
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer].
Chen Y; Chi P
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 28338169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position.
Flor-Lorente B; Frasson M; Montilla E
Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92 Suppl 1():30-9. PubMed ID: 24842689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.
Han JG; Wang ZJ; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Yang Y; Zhao BC
Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):274-82. PubMed ID: 22920402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical treatment of rectal cancer: prospective cohort study about good oncologic results and low rates of abdominoperineal excision.
Faier TAS; Queiroz FL; Lacerda-Filho A; Paiva RA; França Neto PR; Cortes MGW; Carvalho AR; Pereira BMT
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2023; 50():e20233435. PubMed ID: 37531500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 12-year experience of the Trendelenburg perineal approach for abdominoperineal resection.
Toshniwal S; Perera M; Lloyd D; Nguyen H
ANZ J Surg; 2013 Nov; 83(11):853-8. PubMed ID: 23590533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supine bottom-up extralevator abdominoperineal excision for anorectal adenocarcinoma is not inferior to standard approach and may be thus safely performed.
Mège D; de Chaisemartin C; Régis-Marigny L; Poizat F; Meillat H; Zemmour C; Moureau L; Lelong B
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5226-5235. PubMed ID: 36952048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A pictorial description of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Shihab OC; Heald RJ; Holm T; How PD; Brown G; Quirke P; Moran BJ
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e655-60. PubMed ID: 22788385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The LOREC APE registry: operative technique, oncological outcome and perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision.
Jones H; Moran B; Crane S; Hompes R; Cunningham C;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):172-180. PubMed ID: 27321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin.
Wang L; Gu GL; Li ZW; Peng YF; Gu J
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 20(27):9138-45. PubMed ID: 25083087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
