BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23350561)

  • 21. Effect of technique on postoperative perineal wound infections in abdominoperineal resection.
    Showalter SL; Kelz RR; Mahmoud NN
    Am J Surg; 2013 Jul; 206(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 23611838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.
    Stelzner S; Hellmich G; Sims A; Kittner T; Puffer E; Zimmer J; Bleyl D; Witzigmann H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1729-37. PubMed ID: 27631643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.
    Carpelan A; Karvonen J; Varpe P; Rantala A; Kaljonen A; Grönroos J; Huhtinen H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Apr; 33(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 29445870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preliminary Outcome of Individualized Abdominoperineal Excision for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.
    Zheng Y; Han JG; Wang ZJ; Gao ZG; Wei GH; Zhai ZW; Zhao BC
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Jun; 131(11):1268-1274. PubMed ID: 29786037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prone Compared With Lithotomy for Abdominoperineal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    McKechnie T; Lee Y; Springer JE; Doumouras AG; Hong D; Eskicioglu C
    J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():469-480. PubMed ID: 31377486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prone positioning reduces perineal infections when performing the miles procedure.
    Dinaux AM; Amri R; Berger DL
    Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 28610935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The need for future surgical low rectal cancer studies.
    Daniels IR; Strassburg J; Moran BJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8 Suppl 3():25-9. PubMed ID: 16813589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.
    Stelzner S; Koehler C; Stelzer J; Sims A; Witzigmann H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2011 Oct; 26(10):1227-40. PubMed ID: 21603901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: Where to go.
    Tao Y; Han JG; Wang ZJ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 26(22):3012-3023. PubMed ID: 32587445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Research progression of extralevator abdominoperineal excision].
    Xu HR; Xu ZF; Li ZJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 16(7):698-700. PubMed ID: 23888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.
    Prytz M; Angenete E; Ekelund J; Haglind E
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 29(8):981-7. PubMed ID: 24950793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yu HC; Peng H; He XS; Zhao RS
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Feb; 29(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 24271080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trans-perineal minimally invasive approach during extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    Han JG; Wang ZJ; Wei GH; Zhai ZW; Zhao BC
    Asian J Surg; 2020 Aug; 43(8):819-825. PubMed ID: 31982269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer.
    Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
    Han JG; Wang ZJ; Qian Q; Dai Y; Zhang ZQ; Yang JS; Li F; Li XB
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Dec; 57(12):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25379997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer].
    Jiang HY; Zhou YB; Zhang DF
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 16(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 23888442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal excision with modified position change for low rectal Cancer treatment.
    Sun S; Sun S; Zheng X; Yu J; Wang W; Gong Q; Zhao G; Li J; Zhang H
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):916. PubMed ID: 36002810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extralevatory abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) does not result in reduced rate of tumor perforation or rate of positive circumferential resection margin: a nationwide database study.
    Klein M; Fischer A; Rosenberg J; Gögenur I;
    Ann Surg; 2015 May; 261(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 25211268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.
    Hu X; Cao L; Zhang J; Liang P; Liu G
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Mar; 19(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 25367808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
    Ortiz H; Ciga MA; Armendariz P; Kreisler E; Codina-Cazador A; Gomez-Barbadillo J; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
    Br J Surg; 2014 Jun; 101(7):874-82. PubMed ID: 24817654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.