174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23350686)
1. Parietal peritoneal closure versus non-closure at caesarean section: which technique is feasible to perform?
Altinbas SK; Cenksoy P; Tapisiz OL; Beydilli G; Yirci B; Ercan Ö; Dede S; Kandemir O
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1128-31. PubMed ID: 23350686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.
Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 2014(8):CD000163. PubMed ID: 25110856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
Galaal KA; Krolikowski A
Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
Huchon C; Raiffort C; Chis C; Messaoudi F; Jacquemot MC; Panel P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.
van Bogaert LJ; Misra A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 19358028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Towards a simplification of caesarean section technique: non-closure of peritoneum?].
Malek-Mellouli M; Ibrahima S; Ben Amara F; Néji K; Bouchneck M; Youssef A; Nasr M; Zouari B; Reziga H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Oct; 40(6):541-8. PubMed ID: 21764225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: does it have any effect on postoperative vital signs? A prospective randomized study.
Kurek Eken M; Özkaya E; Tarhan T; İçöz Ş; Eroğlu Ş; Kahraman ŞT; Karateke A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(8):922-926. PubMed ID: 27187047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study.
Højberg KE; Aagaard J; Laursen H; Diab L; Secher NJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):741-5. PubMed ID: 9740522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section.
Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (4):CD000163. PubMed ID: 14583915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Peritoneal suture vs. non-suture at caesarean section].
Mocanaşu C; Anton E; Chirilă R
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2005; 109(4):810-2. PubMed ID: 16610179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: evaluation of pain.
Atabekoğlu CS; Türkçüoğlu I; Duru B; Sönmezer M; Süer G; Uysalel A; Koç A; Söylemez F
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 May; 31(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 21534751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
Malomo OO; Kuti O; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Sule SS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-closure of peritoneal surfaces at caesarean section--a systematic review.
Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
S Afr Med J; 2005 Feb; 95(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15751208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.
Weerawetwat W; Buranawanich S; Kanawong M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87(9):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15515998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a prospective randomized study.
Anteby EY; Kruchkovich J; Kapustian V; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Gemer O
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20144167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section.
Wilkinson CS; Enkin MW
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000163. PubMed ID: 10796163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
Zareian Z; Zareian P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
Kapustian V; Anteby EY; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Lavie O; Gemer O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections?
Ohel G; Younis JS; Lang N; Levit A
J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 8972417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
