258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23351314)
1. Informed consent for biobank-dependent research.
Botkin JR
Virtual Mentor; 2012 Aug; 14(8):610-5. PubMed ID: 23351314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?
D'Abramo F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Nov; 69(11):1125-8. PubMed ID: 25669218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A proposed approach to informed consent for biobanks in China.
Liu M; Hu Q
Bioethics; 2014 May; 28(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 22762502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can informed consent go too far? Balancing consent and public benefit in research.
Milner LC; Magnus D
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 23514383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Data citizenship and informed consent.
Francis LP; Francis JG
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 23514394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
Allen J; McNamara B
Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19659851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent, big data, and the oxymoron of research that is not research.
Ioannidis JP
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):40-2. PubMed ID: 23514395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How and when does consent bias research?
Groenwold RH; van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):46-8. PubMed ID: 23514398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical framework for previously collected biobank samples.
Helgesson G; Dillner J; Carlson J; Bartram CR; Hansson MG
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 25(9):973-6. PubMed ID: 17846619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The interaction between research consent and random error.
Trafimow D
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):49-50. PubMed ID: 23514399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of evidence on consent bias in research.
El Emam K; Jonker E; Moher E; Arbuckle L
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 23514396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An unbiased response to the open peer commentaries on "does consent bias research?".
Rothstein MA; Shoben AB
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):W1-4. PubMed ID: 23514403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative consent models for biobanks: the new Spanish law on biomedical research.
da Rocha AC; Seoane JA
Bioethics; 2008 Sep; 22(8):440-7. PubMed ID: 18644013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A thick opt-out is often sufficient.
Giesbertz NA; Bredenoord AL; van Delden JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 23514397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic fences make good neighbors: the importance of medical records managers to protecting autonomy.
Fox MD; Munoz RT
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 23514400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiating and evaluating common good and public good: making implicit assumptions explicit in the contexts of consent and duty to participate.
Bialobrzeski A; Ried J; Dabrock P
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 22722692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed Consent and the Use of Biospecimens in Research.
Eisenhauer ER
Am J Nurs; 2015 Jul; 115(7):11. PubMed ID: 26110932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.
Gurwitz D; Fortier I; Lunshof JE; Knoppers BM
Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5942):818-9. PubMed ID: 19679798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks.
Prainsack B; Buyx A
Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 23325780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bypassing consent for research on biological material.
Hofmann BM
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):979-80; author reply 980-1. PubMed ID: 18779801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
