These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2335162)

  • 1. Spinal stresses in simulated raking with various rake handles.
    Kumar S; Cheng CK
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jan; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2335162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromyography of spinal and abdominal muscles during garden raking with two rakes and rake handles.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1793-804. PubMed ID: 7671857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of handle orientation and between-handle distance on bi-manual isometric push strength.
    Lin JH; McGorry RW; Chang CC
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):664-70. PubMed ID: 22075258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pushing and pulling: personal mechanics influence spine loads.
    Lett KK; McGill SM
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jul; 49(9):895-908. PubMed ID: 16801235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles.
    Davis KG; Marras WS; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1155-68. PubMed ID: 9715674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On assessment of shoulder exercise and load-elicited pain in the cervical spine. Biomechanical analysis of load--EMG--methodological studies of pain provoked by extreme position.
    Harms-Ringdahl K
    Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1986; 14():1-40. PubMed ID: 3464087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A single metric for quantifying biomechanical stress in repetitive motions and exertions.
    Lin ML; Radwin RG; Snook SH
    Ergonomics; 1997 May; 40(5):543-58. PubMed ID: 9149554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower back muscle forces in pushing and pulling.
    Lee KS; Chaffin DB; Waikar AM; Chung MK
    Ergonomics; 1989 Dec; 32(12):1551-63. PubMed ID: 2534511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
    Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spinal loading during manual materials handling in a kneeling posture.
    Splittstoesser RE; Yang G; Knapik GG; Trippany DR; Hoyle JA; Lahoti P; Korkmaz SV; Sommerich CM; Lavender SA; Marras WS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 16517181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spinal loads during individual and team lifting.
    Dennis GJ; Barrett RS
    Ergonomics; 2002 Aug; 45(10):671-81. PubMed ID: 12437851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of static and dynamic biomechanical models.
    Leskinen TP
    Ergonomics; 1985 Jan; 28(1):285-91. PubMed ID: 3996365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimum handle height for an animal-drawn blade harrow.
    Gite LP
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1993 Jun; 22(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 8064148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of rice plow handle design and whole-body posture on grip force and upper-extremity muscle activation.
    Swangnetr M; Kaber D; Phimphasak C; Namkorn P; Saenlee K; Zhu B; Puntumetakul R
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(10):1526-35. PubMed ID: 25026124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Raking it in: the impact of enculturation on chimpanzee tool use.
    Furlong EE; Boose KJ; Boysen ST
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 17516100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.