These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2335162)
1. Spinal stresses in simulated raking with various rake handles. Kumar S; Cheng CK Ergonomics; 1990 Jan; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2335162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electromyography of spinal and abdominal muscles during garden raking with two rakes and rake handles. Kumar S Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1793-804. PubMed ID: 7671857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of handle orientation and between-handle distance on bi-manual isometric push strength. Lin JH; McGorry RW; Chang CC Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):664-70. PubMed ID: 22075258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pushing and pulling: personal mechanics influence spine loads. Lett KK; McGill SM Ergonomics; 2006 Jul; 49(9):895-908. PubMed ID: 16801235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing. Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models. Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles. Davis KG; Marras WS; Waters TR Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1155-68. PubMed ID: 9715674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On assessment of shoulder exercise and load-elicited pain in the cervical spine. Biomechanical analysis of load--EMG--methodological studies of pain provoked by extreme position. Harms-Ringdahl K Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1986; 14():1-40. PubMed ID: 3464087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes. Kumar S Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A single metric for quantifying biomechanical stress in repetitive motions and exertions. Lin ML; Radwin RG; Snook SH Ergonomics; 1997 May; 40(5):543-58. PubMed ID: 9149554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task. Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities. Nicholson AS Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lower back muscle forces in pushing and pulling. Lee KS; Chaffin DB; Waikar AM; Chung MK Ergonomics; 1989 Dec; 32(12):1551-63. PubMed ID: 2534511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis. Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]