BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23351772)

  • 1. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
    Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Custom made bioceramic implants in complex and large cranial reconstruction: a two-year follow-up.
    Staffa G; Barbanera A; Faiola A; Fricia M; Limoni P; Mottaran R; Zanotti B; Stefini R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 40(3):e65-70. PubMed ID: 21640597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue expansion and cranioplasty: For which indications?
    Carloni R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Le Guerinel C; Meningaud JP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1409-15. PubMed ID: 26189146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
    Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial reconstruction with poly(methyl methacrylate) customized cranial implants.
    Huang GJ; Zhong S; Susarla SM; Swanson EW; Huang J; Gordon CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 25376145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cranioplasty for bone defects after craniosynostosis surgery. Case series with literature review.
    Szathmari A; Morgado A; Beuriat PA; Petrescu P; Di Rocco F; Mottolese C
    Neurochirurgie; 2020 Apr; 66(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 32105653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases.
    Shay T; Mitchell KA; Belzberg M; Zelko I; Mahapatra S; Qian J; Mendoza L; Huang J; Brem H; Gordon C
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 85(6):e27-e36. PubMed ID: 33170582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
    Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of large cranial defects with poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) using a rapid prototyping model and a new technique for intraoperative implant modeling.
    Unterhofer C; Wipplinger C; Verius M; Recheis W; Thomé C; Ortler M
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2017; 51(3):214-220. PubMed ID: 28343651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical results of cranioplasty with a polymethylmethacrylate customized cranial implant in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.
    Fiaschi P; Pavanello M; Imperato A; Dallolio V; Accogli A; Capra V; Consales A; Cama A; Piatelli G
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 17(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 26824593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomes.
    Lin AY; Kinsella CR; Rottgers SA; Smith DM; Grunwaldt LJ; Cooper GM; Losee JE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 22337376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.
    Marbacher S; Andereggen L; Erhardt S; Fathi AR; Fandino J; Raabe A; Beck J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2012 Oct; 35(4):527-35; discussion 535. PubMed ID: 22391771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty.
    Lara WC; Schweitzer J; Lewis RP; Odum BC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 10177458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of locally manufactured patient-specific custom made implants for cranial defects using a silicone mould.
    Vlok AJ; Naidoo S; Kamat AS; Lamprecht D
    S Afr J Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 30264941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Cranioplasty with Preformed Titanium versus Freehand Molded Polymethylmethacrylate Implants.
    Höhne J; Werzmirzowsky K; Ott C; Hohenberger C; Hassanin BG; Brawanski A; Schebesch KM
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 May; 79(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 28800664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients.
    Rotaru H; Stan H; Florian IS; Schumacher R; Park YT; Kim SG; Chezan H; Balc N; Baciut M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e169-76. PubMed ID: 22260919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preformed titanium cranioplasty after resection of skull base meningiomas - a technical note.
    Schebesch KM; Höhne J; Gassner HG; Brawanski A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):803-7. PubMed ID: 23434238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controversies in skull reconstruction.
    Zins JE; Langevin CJ; Nasir S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1755-60. PubMed ID: 21119415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
    Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
    Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simplified technique for polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasty: combined cotton stacking and finger fracture method.
    Kung WM; Lin MS
    Brain Inj; 2012; 26(13-14):1737-42. PubMed ID: 22759077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.