These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23352426)

  • 1. Contrast volume use in manual vs automated contrast injection systems for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Hwang JR; D'Alfonso S; Kostuk WJ; Diamantouros P; Teefy P; Jablonsky G; Lavi S
    Can J Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 29(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 23352426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Traditional versus automated injection contrast system in diagnostic and percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: comparison of the contrast volume delivered.
    Anne G; Gruberg L; Huber A; Nikolsky E; Grenadier E; Boulus M; Amikam S; Markiewicz W; Beyar R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 16(7):360-2. PubMed ID: 15282428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated contrast injection in contemporary practice during cardiac catheterization and PCI: effects on contrast-induced nephropathy.
    Call J; Sacrinty M; Applegate R; Little W; Santos R; Baki T; Gandhi S; Kahl F; Kutcher M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 18(10):469-74. PubMed ID: 17042103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Qualitative comparison of coronary angiograms between 4 French catheters with an advanced cardiovascular injection system and 6 French catheters with manual injection.
    Gonzalez MA; Ben-Dor I; Gaglia MA; Torguson R; Shimellis H; Bui A; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Satler LF; Waksman R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 79(5):843-8. PubMed ID: 21805567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the use of traditional hand injection versus automated contrast injectors during cardiac catheterization.
    Godley RW; Joshi K; Breall JA
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 24(12):628-30. PubMed ID: 23220975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of automated contrast injector systems on contrast use and contrast-associated complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Gurm HS; Smith D; Share D; Wohns D; Collins J; Madala M; Koneru S; Menees D; Chetcuti S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 6(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 23523450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial on the efficacy and cardiorenal safety of iodixanol vs. iopromide in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Nie B; Cheng WJ; Li YF; Cao Z; Yang Q; Zhao YX; Guo YH; Zhou YJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Dec; 72(7):958-65. PubMed ID: 19021282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy in diabetic patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization or PCI: role of volume-to-creatinine clearance ratio and iodine dose-to-creatinine clearance ratio.
    Worasuwannarak S; Pornratanarangsi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jan; 93 Suppl 1():S29-34. PubMed ID: 20364554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary angiography using 4 or 6 French diagnostic catheters: a prospective, randomized study.
    Lefevre T; Morice MC; Bonan R; Dumas P; Louvard Y; Karrillon G; Loubeyre C; Piechaud JF
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 Oct; 13(10):674-7. PubMed ID: 11581508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel technique for ultra-low contrast administration during angiography or intervention.
    Nayak KR; Mehta HS; Price MJ; Russo RJ; Stinis CT; Moses JW; Mehran R; Leon MB; Kandzari DE; Teirstein PS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jun; 75(7):1076-83. PubMed ID: 20146209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volume-to-creatinine clearance ratio in patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention: implications of varying definitions of contrast-induced nephropathy.
    Capodanno D; Ministeri M; Cumbo S; Dalessandro V; Tamburino C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):907-12. PubMed ID: 23934631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in Contrast Nephropathy From Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Ultra-Low Contrast Delivery Using an Automated Contrast Injector System.
    Kelly SC; Li S; Stys TP; Thompson PA; Stys AT
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 28(11):446-450. PubMed ID: 27430665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ACIST power injection system reduces the amount of contrast media delivered to the patient, as well as fluoroscopy time, during diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures.
    Brosh D; Assali A; Vaknin-Assa H; Fuchs S; Teplitsky I; Shor N; Kornowski R
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 16373264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A first in human evaluation of a novel contrast media saving device.
    Sapontis J; Barron G; Seneviratne S; Fuernau G; Eitel I; Ledwoch J; Thiele H; Saad M; de Waha S; Poess J; Desch S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(6):928-934. PubMed ID: 28471046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.
    Gómez-Menchero AE; Díaz JF; Sánchez-González C; Cardenal R; Sanghvi AB; Roa-Garrido J; Rodríguez-López JL
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2012 May; 65(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 22465608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with acisted power injection: A randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation.
    Khoukaz S; Kern MJ; Bitar SR; Azrak E; Eisenhauer M; Wolford T; El-Shafei A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 11246259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 4 and 6 French catheters for coronary angiography: real-world modeling.
    Durst R; Lotan C; Nassar H; Gotsman M; Mor E; Varshitzki B; Greganski P; Jabara R; Admon D; Meerkin D; Mosseri M
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Apr; 9(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 17491224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ratio of contrast volume to glomerular filtration rate predicts outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.
    Mager A; Vaknin Assa H; Lev EI; Bental T; Assali A; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 20949583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous coronary intervention under the rigid restriction of contrast media dose in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
    Yamamoto E; Takano H; Takayama M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 18(6):E169-72. PubMed ID: 16775894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.