These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23352813)

  • 1. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence.
    Machtinger R; Racowsky C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Mar; 26(3):210-21. PubMed ID: 23352813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment.
    Kirkegaard K; Agerholm IE; Ingerslev HJ
    Hum Reprod; 2012 May; 27(5):1277-85. PubMed ID: 22419744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research.
    Wong C; Chen AA; Behr B; Shen S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Feb; 26(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 23273754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is morphokinetic analysis the answer?
    Aparicio B; Cruz M; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Dec; 27(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 24135156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted embryo selection: a benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality?
    Paternot G; Debrock S; D'Hooghe T; Spiessens C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Sep; 23(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 21782515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New approaches to embryo selection.
    Montag M; Toth B; Strowitzki T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Nov; 27(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 23933036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-lapse imaging of preimplantation embryos.
    Conaghan J
    Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Mar; 32(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 24515908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation.
    Dal Canto M; Coticchio G; Mignini Renzini M; De Ponti E; Novara PV; Brambillasca F; Comi R; Fadini R
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Nov; 25(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 22995750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical experience employing co-culture of human embryos with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells.
    Rubio C; Simón C; Mercader A; Garcia-Velasco J; Remohí J; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 6():31-8. PubMed ID: 11261481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of the promises and pitfalls of oocyte and embryo metabolomics.
    Nel-Themaat L; Nagy ZP
    Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S257-63. PubMed ID: 21703683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats analysis on time lapse.
    Basile N; Elkhatib I; Meseguer M
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 31(3):148-155. PubMed ID: 30925520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which morphological scoring system is relevant in human embryo development?
    Montag M; Liebenthron J; Köster M
    Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S252-6. PubMed ID: 21782239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Does embryo morphology constitute a reliable criterion for embryo selection?].
    Scalici E; Gala A; Ferrières A; Vincens C; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Sep; 42(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 25153441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology.
    Kirkegaard K; Ahlström A; Ingerslev HJ; Hardarson T
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 25527231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine morphological scoring systems in assisted reproduction treatment fail to reflect age-related impairment of oocyte and embryo quality.
    Stensen MH; Tanbo T; Storeng R; Byholm T; Fèdorcsak P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Jul; 21(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 20452822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics.
    Herrero J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1030-4. PubMed ID: 23395415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-culture of the early human embryo: factors affecting human blastocyst formation in vitro.
    Ménézo YJ; Sakkas D; Janny L
    Microsc Res Tech; 1995 Sep; 32(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 8573773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study.
    VerMilyea MD; Tan L; Anthony JT; Conaghan J; Ivani K; Gvakharia M; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Suraj V; Chen AA; Mainigi M; Coutifaris C; Shen S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Dec; 29(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 25444507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive imaging systems for gametes and embryo selection in IVF programs: a review.
    Omidi M; Faramarzi A; Agharahimi A; Khalili MA
    J Microsc; 2017 Sep; 267(3):253-264. PubMed ID: 28470749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) and standard day 2 or 3 embryo morphology with regard to assisted reproductive technique outcomes.
    Payne JF; Raburn DJ; Couchman GM; Price TM; Jamison MG; Walmer DK
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Oct; 84(4):900-9. PubMed ID: 16213842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.