BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23353002)

  • 1. Cost analysis of anterior-posterior circumferential fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Andres TM; Park JJ; Ricart Hoffiz PA; McHugh BJ; Warren DT; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 23353002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
    Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion.
    Jazini E; Gum JL; Glassman SD; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Dimar JR; McGraw KE; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1969-1973. PubMed ID: 29705337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
    Patel VV; Estes S; Lindley EM; Burger E
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
    Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
    Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Witham TF; Aaronson OS; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21506066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Xue H; Tu Y; Cai M
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 22381573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Crandall DG; Revella J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Cha TD; Khan SN; Fineberg SJ; Pelton MA
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1118-25. PubMed ID: 24029138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.