These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2335320)

  • 1. [The cochlear implant and its psychosocial effects in 36 patients].
    Eisenwort B; Kropiunigg U; Burian K
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1990; 42(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 2335320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advantages and disadvantages reported by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS; Kelsay D
    Am J Otol; 1990 Jul; 11(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 2399950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.
    Gray RF; Quinn SJ; Court I; Vanat Z; Baguley DM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():275-7. PubMed ID: 7668667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personal, social, and family adjustment in school-aged children with a cochlear implant.
    Nicholas JG; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):69S-81S. PubMed ID: 12612482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Rehabilitation of cochlear implant patients].
    Eisenwort B; Burian K
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):329-31. PubMed ID: 3170277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Psychological aspects of cochlear implantation].
    Meisels R; Beny A; Erdreich M; Podoshin L; Fradis M; Ben-David Y
    Harefuah; 1992 Apr; 122(8):485-7, 552. PubMed ID: 1398311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative predictors of outcomes from cochlear implantation in adults: performance and quality of life.
    Summerfield AQ; Marshall DH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():105-8. PubMed ID: 7668594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation.
    O'Donoghue GM; Nikolopoulos TP; Archbold SM; Tait M
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 9831151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users.
    Kou BS; Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8170029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantages and disadvantages expected and realized by pediatric cochlear implant recipients as reported by their parents.
    Kelsay DM; Tyler RS
    Am J Otol; 1996 Nov; 17(6):866-73. PubMed ID: 8915415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical results of the French multichannel cochlear implant.
    Fugain C; Meyer B; Chabolle F; Chouard CH
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():237-46. PubMed ID: 6596848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trials with a 22-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Dec; 95(12):1448-54. PubMed ID: 3906323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech tracking in the evaluation of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis.
    Jenkins H; Chmiel R; Jerger J
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Mar; 99(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 2918797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.