122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23353661)
1. Somatosensory P2 reflects resource allocation in a game task: assessment with an irrelevant probe technique using electrical probe stimuli to shoulders.
Sugimoto F; Katayama J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Feb; 87(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 23353661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
Sambo CF; Forster B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The interaction between somatosensory and auditory cognitive processing assessed with event-related potentials.
Touge T; Gonzalez D; Wu J; Deguchi K; Tsukaguchi M; Shimamura M; Ikeda K; Kuriyama S
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 25(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 18340272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maintenance of tactile short-term memory for locations is mediated by spatial attention.
Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 21925566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural correlates of performance trade-offs and dual-task interference in bimanual coordination: an ERP investigation.
Matthews A; Garry MI; Martin F; Summers J
Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 400(1-2):172-6. PubMed ID: 16530954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
Bolton DA; Staines WR
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modulation of somatosensory event-related potential components in a tactile-visual cross-modal task.
Ohara S; Lenz FA; Zhou YD
Neuroscience; 2006; 138(4):1387-95. PubMed ID: 16442738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study.
Veldhuijzen DS; Kenemans JL; van Wijck AJ; Olivier B; Kalkman CJ; Volkerts ER
Pain; 2006 Mar; 121(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 16480825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological assessment of driving pleasure and difficulty using a task-irrelevant probe technique.
Takeda Y; Inoue K; Kimura M; Sato T; Nagai C
Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():137-141. PubMed ID: 27693475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of transient spatial attention on the processing of intracutaneous electrical stimuli examined with ERPs.
Van der Lubbe RH; Buitenweg JR; Boschker M; Gerdes B; Jongsma ML
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):947-59. PubMed ID: 21996000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early somatosensory event-related potentials reveal attentional bias for internal stimuli in social anxiety.
Kanai Y; Nittono H; Kubo K; Sasaki-Aoki S; Iwanaga M
Biol Psychol; 2012 Mar; 89(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 22285128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory and visual cortical activity during selective attention in fragile X syndrome: a cascade of processing deficiencies.
Van der Molen MJ; Van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR; Hamel BC; Curfs LM; Ramakers GJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):720-9. PubMed ID: 21958658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials.
Vallesi A; Stuss DT; McIntosh AR; Picton TW
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19022270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Movement-related changes in cortical excitability: a steady-state SEP approach.
Kourtis D; Seiss E; Praamstra P
Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1244():113-20. PubMed ID: 18845129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-related loss in attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
Bolton DA; Staines WR
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1502-13. PubMed ID: 22406692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underlying mechanisms of the P3a task-difficulty effect.
Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):731-41. PubMed ID: 18665864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Somatosensory mismatch negativity in healthy children.
Restuccia D; Zanini S; Cazzagon M; Del Piero I; Martucci L; Della Marca G
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2009 Dec; 51(12):991-8. PubMed ID: 19909309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
Lange K; Röder B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
