These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23353712)

  • 1. A retrospective study of patients' out-of-pocket costs for granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.
    Tomic K; Long S; Li X; Fu AC; Yu TC; Barron R
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2013 Dec; 19(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 23353712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
    Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative effectiveness of pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and sargramostim prophylaxis for neutropenia-related hospitalization: two US retrospective claims analyses.
    Henk HJ; Becker L; Tan H; Yu J; Kavati A; Naeim A; Deeter R; Barron R
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 23016568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pegfilgrastim: a review of the pharmacoeconomics for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Rofail P; Tadros M; Ywakim R; Tadrous M; Krug A; Cosler LE
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2012 Dec; 12(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 23252353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hospitalization risk and associated costs among patients receiving sargramostim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Heaney ML; Toy EL; Vekeman F; Laliberté F; Dority BL; Perlman D; Barghout V; Duh MS
    Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(20):4839-48. PubMed ID: 19637341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving epirubicin and docetaxel/paclitaxel with colony-stimulating growth factors: a comparison of filgrastim or lenograstim with pegfilgrastim.
    Schippinger W; Holub R; Dandachi N; Bauernhofer T; Samonigg H
    Oncology; 2006; 70(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16899982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrete choice experiment to estimate breast cancer patients' preferences and willingness to pay for prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.
    Johnson P; Bancroft T; Barron R; Legg J; Li X; Watson H; Naeim A; Watkins A; Marshall DA
    Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):380-9. PubMed ID: 24968998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a formulary change from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on outcomes in patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Wong SF; Chan HO
    Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Mar; 25(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 15843284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) after conventional chemotherapy in children with cancer.
    Riikonen P; Rahiala J; Salonvaara M; Perkkiö M
    Stem Cells; 1995 May; 13(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 7542114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic implications of using pegfilgrastim rather than conventional G-CSF to prevent neutropenia during small-cell lung cancer chemotherapy.
    Tan Sean P; Chouaid C; Hettler D; Baud M; Hejblum G; Tilleul P
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1455-60. PubMed ID: 19419340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
    Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neutropenia-associated outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
    Bradley AM; Deal AM; Buie LW; van Deventer H
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Dec; 32(12):1070-7. PubMed ID: 23208834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
    Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost comparison of outpatient treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in Germany.
    Hadji P; Kostev K; Schröder-Bernhardi D; Ziller V
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Apr; 50(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 22456299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic analysis of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
    Eldar-Lissai A; Cosler LE; Culakova E; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2008; 11(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 18380630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.