These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23353980)
1. The author replies. Howell MD Crit Care Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):e24. PubMed ID: 23353980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the success of rapid response systems. Barrett J Crit Care Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):e23. PubMed ID: 23353979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Run, don't walk. Hillman KM Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2712-3. PubMed ID: 22903094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sustained effectiveness of a primary-team-based rapid response system. Howell MD; Ngo L; Folcarelli P; Yang J; Mottley L; Marcantonio ER; Sands KE; Moorman D; Aronson MD Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2562-8. PubMed ID: 22732285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit. Keegan MT; Gajic O; Afessa B Crit Care Med; 2011 Jan; 39(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 20838329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rhythms and outcomes of cardiac arrest. Weil MH; Tang W Crit Care Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):310. PubMed ID: 20023476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In reference to "A novel configuration of a traditional rapid response team decreases non-intensive care unit arrests and overall hospital mortality". Singh S J Hosp Med; 2015 Oct; 10(10):703. PubMed ID: 26316299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The authors reply "A novel configuration of a traditional rapid response team decreases non-intensive care unit arrests and overall hospital mortality". Davis D; Aguilar S J Hosp Med; 2015 Oct; 10(10):704. PubMed ID: 26402866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital outcomes associated with introduction of a two-tiered response to the deteriorating patient. Frost SA; Chapman A; Aneman A; Chen J; Parr MJ; Hillman K Crit Care Resusc; 2015 Jun; 17(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 26017124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In search of the optimal rapid response system bundle. Churpek MM; Edelson DP J Hosp Med; 2015 Jun; 10(6):411. PubMed ID: 25772513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Thromboprophylaxis in the real world: strengths and limitations of comparative effectiveness research. Gould MK; Jones JP Chest; 2011 Dec; 140(6):1401-1404. PubMed ID: 22147816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid-response teams. Jones DA; DeVita MA; Bellomo R N Engl J Med; 2011 Jul; 365(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 21751906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peeling away the layers of the volume-outcome effect and harvesting hidden connections. Fernández Pérez ER; Frankel SK Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2713-5. PubMed ID: 22903095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lactate: an unusually sensitive parameter of ensuing organ failure? van Beest P; Kuiper M; Spronk PE Crit Care Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):337; author reply 337-8. PubMed ID: 20023494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid response systems. Hillman KM; Chen J; Jones D Med J Aust; 2014 Nov; 201(9):519-21. PubMed ID: 25358575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emergency department rapid response systems: the case for a standardized approach to deteriorating patients. Considine J; Jones D; Bellomo R Eur J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 20(6):375-81. PubMed ID: 23325146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]