These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2335485)

  • 1. Discrimination training for persons with developmental disabilities: a comparison of the task demonstration model and the standard prompting hierarchy.
    Repp AC; Karsh KG; Lenz MW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 2335485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the Task Demonstration Model and the Standard Prompting Hierarchy in teaching word identification to persons with moderate retardation.
    Karsh KG; Repp AC; Lenz MW
    Res Dev Disabil; 1990; 11(4):395-410. PubMed ID: 2270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of static and dynamic presentation procedures on discrimination learning of individuals with severe or moderate mental retardation.
    Karsh KG; Dahlquist CM; Repp AC
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(3):167-86. PubMed ID: 7938786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus generalization following extra-dimensional training in educationally subnormal (severely) children.
    Hogg J; Evans PL
    Br J Psychol; 1975 May; 66(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 1156743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing a normal peer as a behavioral model for developmentally delayed toddlers.
    Apolloni T; Cooke SA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Feb; 44(1):231-41. PubMed ID: 138846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errorless learning: reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting.
    Touchette PE; Howard JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 6735950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting of letter discrimination by mentally retarded persons.
    Wolfe VF; Cuvo AJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Nov; 83(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 717444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing overselective attention to compound visual cues with extended training in adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(2):93-113. PubMed ID: 10817417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus class formation and concept learning: establishment of within- and between-set generalization and transitive relationships via conditional discrimination procedures.
    Haring TG; Breen CG; Laitinen RE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jul; 52(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 2527943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. S+ versus S- fading in teaching visual discriminations to severely mentally handicapped children.
    Strand SC
    J Ment Defic Res; 1989 Aug; 33 ( Pt 4)():283-99. PubMed ID: 2769740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constructed-response matching to sample and spelling instruction.
    Dube WV; McDonald SJ; McIlvane WJ; Mackay HA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(2):305-17. PubMed ID: 1890049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training generalized receptive prepositions in retarded children.
    Frisch SA; Schumaker JB
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1974; 7(4):611-21. PubMed ID: 4443328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children.
    Mosk MD; Bucher B
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 6725167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cues-pause-point language training: teaching echolalics functional use of their verbal labeling repertoires.
    McMorrow MJ; Foxx RM; Faw GD; Bittle RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1987; 20(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 3583962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalization of naming responses to objects in the natural environment as a function of training stimulus modality with retarded children.
    Welch SJ; Pear JJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1980; 13(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 6451607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of simultaneous prompting on teaching receptively identifying occupations from picture cards.
    Dogan OS; Tekin-Iftar E
    Res Dev Disabil; 2002; 23(4):237-52. PubMed ID: 12365849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures.
    Saunders RR; Wachter J; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 3346622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of a discrimination-training procedure to teach mand variability to children with autism.
    Brodhead MT; Higbee TS; Gerencser KR; Akers JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 26696376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conservation acquisition, maintenance, and generalization by mentally retarded children using equality-rule training.
    Hendler M; Weisberg P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1992 Jun; 53(3):258-76. PubMed ID: 1613452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matching training procedures to outcomes. A behavioral and quantitative analysis.
    McConville ML; Hantula DA; Axelrod S
    Behav Modif; 1998 Jul; 22(3):391-414. PubMed ID: 9722476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.