514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23355365)
1. Evaluation of shear bond strength of silorane resin to conventional, resin-modified glass ionomers and nano-ionomer cements.
Babannavar R; Shenoy A
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23355365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.
Sabatini C; Patel M; D'Silva E
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22913244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of thermocycling on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study.
Arici S; Arici N
Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 14719734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.
Korkmaz Y; Gurgan S; Firat E; Nathanson D
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 20166411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro shear bond strength of resin-based luting cements to dentin.
Santos MJ; Driessen CH; de Freitas AP; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e215-20. PubMed ID: 22782054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of etching and adhesive applications on the bond strength between composite resin and glass-ionomer cements.
Pamir T; Sen BH; Evcin O
J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 23329245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin reinforced chemical cure glass ionomer, conventional chemical cure glass ionomer and chemical cure composite resin in direct bonding systems: an in vitro study.
Rao KS; Reddy TP; Yugandhar G; Kumar BS; Reddy SN; Babu DA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 23579887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the shear bond strengths to a resin composite of two conventional and two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements.
Chadwick RG; Woolford MJ
J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8473591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
Oilo G; Um CM
Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The repair potential of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
Maneenut C; Sakoolnamarka R; Tyas MJ
Dent Mater; 2010 Jul; 26(7):659-65. PubMed ID: 20409575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
