These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23355462)

  • 1. Computerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators.
    Embi PJ; Weir C; Efthimiadis EN; Thielke SM; Hedeen AN; Hammond KW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(4):718-26. PubMed ID: 23355462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians.
    Embi PJ; Yackel TR; Logan JR; Bowen JL; Cooney TG; Gorman PN
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 15064287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical issues in an electronic documentation system.
    Weir CR; Nebeker JR
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; 2007():786-90. PubMed ID: 18693944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. VA QUERI informatics paper: information technology for clinical guideline implementation: perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders.
    Lyons SS; Tripp-Reimer T; Sorofman BA; Dewitt JE; Bootsmiller BJ; Vaughn TE; Doebbeling BN
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2005; 12(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 15492035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study.
    Stevenson JE; Nilsson G
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Mar; 68(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 21781148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EHR implementation in a new clinic: a case study of clinician perceptions.
    Noblin A; Cortelyou-Ward K; Cantiello J; Breyer T; Oliveira L; Dangiolo M; Cannarozzi M; Yeung T; Berman S
    J Med Syst; 2013 Aug; 37(4):9955. PubMed ID: 23780429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What are they trying to do?: An analysis of Action Identities in using electronic documentation in an EHR.
    Weir CR; Staes C; Slager S; Taft T; Chidambaram V; Kramer H; Bray BE; Moore SP
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1764-1772. PubMed ID: 29854247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study.
    Murphy DR; Satterly T; Giardina TD; Sittig DF; Singh H
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1825-1832. PubMed ID: 31292905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A qualitative analysis of academic and private physicians and administrators' perceptions of health information technology.
    Grabenbauer L; Fraser-Maginn RS; McClay JC; Windle JR
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():965. PubMed ID: 18694065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses.
    Koskela T; Sandström S; Mäkinen J; Liira H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26801630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exploration of the impact of computerized patient documentation on clinical collaboration.
    Weir CR; Hammond KW; Embi PJ; Efthimiadis EN; Thielke SM; Hedeen AN
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Aug; 80(8):e62-71. PubMed ID: 21300565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders.
    Saleem JJ; Patterson ES; Militello L; Render ML; Orshansky G; Asch SM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2005; 12(4):438-47. PubMed ID: 15802482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information.
    Darbyshire P
    J Clin Nurs; 2004 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 14687289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized clinical pathways (care plans): piloting a strategy to enhance quality patient care.
    Hyde E; Murphy B
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2012; 26(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 22903208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping the route to medication therapy management documentation and billing standardization and interoperabilility within the health care system: meeting proceedings.
    Millonig MK
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2009; 49(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 19357067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of the electronic medical record on nurses' work.
    Robles J
    Creat Nurs; 2009; 15(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 19343848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inappropriate Antibiotic Allergy Documentation in Health Records: A Qualitative Study on Family Physicians' and Pharmacists' Experiences.
    De Clercq K; Cals JWL; de Bont EGPM
    Ann Fam Med; 2020 Jul; 18(4):326-333. PubMed ID: 32661033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting physicians' use of a dedicated overview interface in an electronic health record: The importance of standard information and standard documentation.
    Jensen LG; Bossen C
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():44-53. PubMed ID: 26806711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. You and me and the computer makes three: variations in exam room use of the electronic health record.
    Saleem JJ; Flanagan ME; Russ AL; McMullen CK; Elli L; Russell SA; Bennett KJ; Matthias MS; Rehman SU; Schwartz MD; Frankel RM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014 Feb; 21(e1):e147-51. PubMed ID: 24001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.